Skip to main content

Tragic Closure and Tragic Disclosure

  • Chapter
Shakespeare and the Shapes of Time
  • 38 Accesses

Abstract

After Antony has run on his sword thinking to ‘o’ertake’ Cleopatra, one of the guardsmen who discovers him proclaims that ‘time is at his period’ (Antony and Cleopatra iv. xiv. 107). The soldier, of course, wishes to indicate the enormous impact that Antony’s death will have, but clearly the passing of even one of the triple pillars of the world cannot bring time to a stop. The open-ended structures of Shakespeare’s history plays declare the lie of the soldier’s perspective. The history plays acknowledge the uninterruptible process of history itself, exerting pressure upon an audience to recognize the play’s formal limits as arbitrary and contingent. Yet, like the soldier, Shakespeare’s tragedies wilfully ignore historical time. The tragic process does indeed bring time to ‘his period’ — not the historical time that is the significant time of the history plays but le temps humain, time as it is directly and immediately experienced by the individual.

These sudden ends of time must give us pause — Richard Wilbur, ‘Year’s End’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Robert Potter, The English Morality Play (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975) pp. 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Heilman, Tragedy and Melodrama (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1967) pp 160, 161. The emphasis is mine. See also Herbert Weisinger’s study, Tragedy and the Paradox of the Fortunate Fall (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1953) esp. pp. 19–30. For Weisinger, the fortunate fall is ‘the ideological backbone’ of tragedy.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. G. Clark, ‘Darkened Reason in “Macbeth” ’. Durham University Journal, 22 (1960) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. McAlindon, Shakespeare and Decorum (New York: Barnes and Noble, 1973) p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 David Scott Kastan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kastan, D.S. (1982). Tragic Closure and Tragic Disclosure. In: Shakespeare and the Shapes of Time. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06145-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics