Abstract
Austen’s earliest novel, Northanger Abbey (1803; published 1818), is by far the most ‘bookish’. Written in response to contemporary fiction, it exhibits the most visibly comic relation to that fiction of all Austen’s full-length works. It insists on pointing up, and treating comically, the incongruities between literature and life, and the tendencies of novels to imitate each other rather than life. In this sense, Northanger Abbey is a novel about writing novels, even an ‘anti-novel’, as long as these terms imply no portentousness and allow Austen to delight in, and occasionally to exploit, the conventions she exposes and parodies. Later, in Sense and Sensibility and Pride and Prejudice, allusions to the conventions of contemporary fiction will be equally pervasive, but less obvious and more fully absorbed. Some conventions, especially structural ones, will simply be appropriated (courtship ending in marriage, two central contrasting female characters). Others, Austen will learn to use as one means to complicate and manipulate her readers’ responses to the characters: witness the problems for interpretation caused in Sense and Sensibility by Marianne Dashwood, who is a highly conventional character both in that her tastes, judgments and behaviour are governed by established modes of sensibility, and in that she shares this quality with many other contemporary heroines. Austen’s later novels include, then, some serious uses for literary conventions. In Northanger Abbey, however, comic, flamboyant and even outrageous allusions to books and their conventions are the rule.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Amusingly enough, when Austen describes the heroine’s father on the first page as ‘a very respectable man, though his name was Richard’, she may actually be alluding to a passage from the burlesque ‘History of England’, one of her own juvenilia, which blandly, deflatingly describes Richard III as ‘a very respectable Man’ (MW, p. 141).
Augustus J. C. Hare (ed.), The Life and Letters of Maria Edgeworth (Boston, 1895) I, p. 260.
A. Walton Litz, Jane Austen: A Study of Her Artistic Development (New York, 1965) p. 63.
Kenneth Moler, Jane Austen’s Art of Allusion (Lincoln, Neb., 1968) p. 40.
Austen uses this term favourably in a letter to her niece Anna, whose manuscript novel she is reading and criticizing. The context is revealing: ‘I wish you could make Mrs F. talk more, but she must be difficult to manage & make entertaining, because there is so much good common sence & propriety about her that nothing can be very broad. Her Economy and her Ambition must not be staring’ (L, p. 402). Austen clearly loves broad dialogue, though she restricts it carefully, and usually finds it inconsistent with sensible characters. Interestingly, and perhaps significantly, in Catherine Morland Austen has created a character whose artlessness and naïveté do allow broad, entertaining dialogue even though Catherine possesses some degree of ‘common sence & propriety’.
Kenneth Moler, Art of Allusion, p. 23.
A. Walton Litz, Artistic Development, p. 63.
For an alternative and very ingenious reading of Austen’s didactic intentions, see Eric Rothstein’s ‘The Lessons of Northanger Abbey’, UTQ, 44 (1974) pp. 14–30.
J. M. S. Tompkins, Popular Novel in England, p. 103.
Ann Radcliffe, The Romance of the Forest (London, 1971) II, p. 13. This passage is included in the selections printed by Chapman (P, p. 290).
Romance of the Forest, II, pp. 14–15. This passage is reprinted by Chapman only in part. It should be noted that in citing passages from this novel only, I do Radcliffe seeming injustice, as it is an early work. But even in Udolpho the climactic passages (Emily’s discovery of what lies behind the black veil, her visit to the tower with Barnardine and near abduction by him) are not written with anything approaching Austen’s skill or effectiveness.
Eaton Stannard Barrett, The Heroine, or Adventures of Cherubina, 2nd ed., rev. (London, 1814) II, pp. 137–8). Amazingly enough, the passage cited is one of Barrett’s more successful ones.
Marvin Mudrick, Jane Austen: Irony as Defense and Discovery (1952; rpt Berkeley, 1968) pp. 55 and 56.
V. H. Hjelmaa is writing a doctoral thesis at the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne which documents the extent to which Forster’s early novels in particular drew upon and thus criticized the novels of his contemporaries.
Copyright information
© 1983 Jan Fergus
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fergus, J. (1983). Northanger Abbey. In: Jane Austen and the Didactic Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06100-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06100-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06102-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06100-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)