Abstract
The declared aim of Pot-Bouille was the depiction of the mentality and morals of the Parisian bourgeoisie: ‘Montrer la bourgeoisie à nu, après avoir montré le peuple, et la montrer plus abominable, elle qui se dit l’ordre et l’honnêteté.’1 Paul Alexis, explaining the title of the novel, wrote: ‘Aux bourgeois qui disent: nous sommes l’honneur, la morale, la famille, il [Zola] voulait répondre: ce n’est pas vrai, vous êtes le mensonge de tout cela, votre pot-bouille est la marmite où mijotent toutes les pourritures de la famille et tous les relâchements de la morale.’2 Zola’s intentions in this neglected novel are emphatically satirical; but although the book is intended as a comprehensive indictment of the bourgeoisie, it focuses on the theme of sexuality, which is seen as a mechanical, animal activity sustained by habit and propelled by cynicism. The pervading atmosphere, heightened by structural repetition and circularity, is one of furtive secrecy and sour monotony. Although Pot-Bouille has some of the outward forms of a bedroom farce, there is no trace of gaiety or gauloiserie in its depiction of ‘adultères sans passion sexuelle’ (‘adultery without sexual passion’).3 What is striking about the novel is the acerbity of its tone, the deeply sombre nature of its indictment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Borie sees the whole of Zola’s literary enterprise as both an expression and an indictment of these forms of ‘organisation culturelle’: see Zola et les mythes, p. 8. The idea of a repressed sexuality, false puritanism and a hidden life are of course common nineteenth-century themes: see Fraser Harrison, The Dark Angel: Aspects of Victorian Sexuality (London: Sheldon Press, 1977) (especially ‘Middle-Class Sexuality’, pp. 3–154);
Derek Hudson (ed.), Munby: Man of Two Worlds (London: John Murray, 1972);
Stephen Marcus, The Other Victorians (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966); (Anon.), My Secret Life (London, c. 1890);
Ronald Pearsall, The Worm in the Bud: The World of Victorian Sexuality (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969).
Pot-Bouille was immediately dramatised by William Busnach, with Zola’s assistance. For a general discussion of the dramatisation of Zola’s novels, see Martin Kanes, ‘Zola and Busnach: The Temptation of the Stage’, PMLA, LXXVII (1962), 109–15.
Notes de travail, B.N. MS. Nouv.acq. fr. 10321, fol. 391. For a detailed account of the political references in Pot-Bouille, see E.M. Grant, ‘The Political Scene in Zola’s Pot-Bouille’, French Studies, VIII (1954), 342–7.
‘Every page and every line of Pot-Bouille was written with the aim of giving the book a moral intention. It is without doubt a cruel work, but it is above all a moral work, in the true, philosophical sense of the word.’ (Quoted by F. W.J. Hemmings, Emile Zola, second edition [Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966], p. 145.)
André Gide, Journal, 1889–1939 (Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1951), p. 1137 (entry dated 17 July 1932).
Copyright information
© 1983 Brian Nelson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nelson, B. (1983). Pot-Bouille: Black Comedy. In: Zola and the Bourgeoisie. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06097-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06097-9_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06099-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06097-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)