Skip to main content
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

Deputies in representative assemblies constitute, symbolically at least, the broad mass contact necessary for ideological consistency in Communist Party states; they allow the claim from the party leadership that centralism is pursued and maintained only from a democratic ‘base’. The participation by citizens as deputies in local people’s councils and national assemblies, in other words, is necessary for communist governments as long as the image of representation is useful for the party. The following analysis probes the relationship of a communist government with the citizens it rules in one such system, the Socialist Republic of Romania. As a ‘window’ through which to view such a relationship, data from interviews with local-level deputies will be the empirical core of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This chapter is a revised version of an essay published as ‘Citizen participation in Romania: the people’s council deputy’ in Daniel N. Nelson (ed.), Local Politics in Communist Countries. Lexington, Ky.: University of Kentucky Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel Nelson, Democratic Centralism in Romania (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980); see particularly Chapter II, where socio-economic comparisons are made.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See the list of organisations included in FUS in Scinteia Tineretulti, 20 December 1968, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Nicolae Ceauşescu, Romania pe drumul construirii societaţii socialiste multilateral dezvoltate, vol. 5 (Bucharest: Editura Politica, 1971) p. 505.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nistor Prisca, Democratismul sistemului Electoral in Republica Socialista Romania (Bucharest: Editura Politica, 1975) pp. 54–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ioan Vida, Deputatul-Împuternicit şi Factor Mobilizator al Cetǎţenilor (Bucharest: Editura Politica, 1973) p. 12; well over half of MAN deputies have backgrounds listed as ‘workers or peasants’, but this is by no means their present occupation.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A number of developments since the mid-1970s, however, may have somewhat increased the MAN’s potential contribution in this respect: a permanent body to analyse the socio-economic development of local units and to examine and refine all bills relating to such matters, the Legislative Council, was set up in 1975, and the two annual sessions of the assembly have become longer. There is also a developing committee structure. See Ion Vintu, ‘Une période nouvelle au cours du développement de la démocratie socialiste en Roumanie’, Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales, 20, no. 2 (1976) pp. 181–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. W. Milbrath, Political Participation (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965) pp. 13ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. These qualities of participation in a democratic political system are mentioned by Alexander J. Groth in Comparative Politics: A Distributive Approach (New York: Macmillan, 1971) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sidney Tarrow, ‘The urban-rural cleavage in political involvement’, American Political Science Review, 65 (June 1971) pp. 341–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Norman H. Nie, G. B. Powell and K. Prewitt, ‘Social structure and political participation: developmental relationships’, 2 parts, American Political Science Review, 63 (June and September 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Frederic J. Fleron, ‘Co-optation as a mechanism of adaptation to change: the Soviet political leadership system’, Polity, 2 (1969) pp. 176–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stephen Fischer-Galati, The New Romania (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1970) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Samuel P. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968) pp. 33–5, especially Huntington’s citation of Deutsch, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See the conclusions offered in Stephen White, ‘Communist systems and the “iron law of pluralism”’, British Journal of Political Science, 8 (January 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daniel N. Nelson, ‘Political convergence: an empirical assessment’, World Politics, 30 (April 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a fuller discussion of central control over local political life, see Daniel N. Nelson, ‘Vertical integration and political control in Eastern Europe’, Slavic Review (forthcoming, 1981.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1982 Daniel N. Nelson and Stephen Leonard White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, D. (1982). People’s Council Deputies in Romania. In: Nelson, D., White, S. (eds) Communist Legislatures in Comparative Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06086-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics