Skip to main content

The Vietnam War, 1963–8

  • Chapter
The Great Power Triangle
  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

The most dominant conflict of the 1960s was certainly the Vietnam war. The conflict underwent a myriad of transformations over the years and evolved into a clear case of great power tripolarity. The case study that follows will analyse the twists and turns in order to understand the most salient features of the triangular relationship. The war not only involved specific Southeast Asian issues, but also had a great significance for the strategic balance of power. In this chapter the tripolar relations in Vietnam will be related to the changes on the strategic level and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Schurmann, The Logic of World Power p.466. For a detailed analysis of US decision making see Leslie Gelb and Richard Betts, The Irony of Vietnam: The System Worked (Washington: Brookings, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edgar Snow, ‘Interview with Mao’ The New Republic, vol.152 no.9 (27 Feb. 1965) p.22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Sergeichuk, Through Russian Eyes: American-Chinese Relations (Arlington: International Library, 1975) pp.119–21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tass on 8 Feb. reported Kosygin’s 7 Feb. speech. Pravda 9 Feb. in CDSP, vol.17, no.6 p.5. Lyndon Johnson, Vantage Point (New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1971) p.123. Whiting, Deterrence p.178. It was Whiting’s idea. On the ‘streetcar principle’ see Townsend Hoopes, The Limits of Intervention (New York: David McKay, 1969) p.30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ross Terrill, ‘On the Brink of Ambiguity: China Without Mao’ The New Republic, vol.175 no.13 25 Sept. 1976 p.27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leslie Gelb and Richard Betts, The Irony of Vietnam: The System Worked (Washington: Brookings, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cited in Jay Taylor, China and Southeast Asia (New York: Praeger, 1976) p.46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid, pp.97–9. Marvin Kalb and Eli Abel, Roots of Involvement: the US in Asia 1784–1971 (London: Pall Mall, 1971) p.188.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dorris Kearns, Lyndon Johnson the American Dream (London: Andre Deutsch, 1976) pp.264–5. To Evans and Novack cited in Pentagon Papers (Gravel) vol.3, p.354. Ibid, p.348.

    Google Scholar 

  10. On the debate we rely on Segal, ‘Soviet Connection’, Harry Harding and Melvin Gurtov, The Purge of Lo-Jui-ch’ing (Santa Monica: Rand Corp., Feb. 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. and Thomas Gottlieb, Chinese Foreign Policy Factionalism and the Origins of the Strategic Triangle, R-1902-NA (Santa Monica: Rand Corp., Nov. 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reported in Harvy Nelsen, The Chinese Military System (London: Thornton Cox, 1977) pp.96–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin’s argument is best discussed by D.P. Mozingo and Thomas Robinson, Lin Piao on ‘People’s War’: China Takes a Second Look at Vietnam. RM-4814 (Santa Monica: Rand Corp., Nov. 1965). See also Zagoria, Vietnam Triangle pp.78–83,87–91 Lo’s speech in Peking Review, vol.8, no.36 (3 Sept. 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid, and Harding and Gurtov, Lo Jui-ch’ing pp.41–3. Ellis Joffe, ‘China’s Intraleadership Conflict, 1959–1962’, Michigan Papers in Chinese Studies No.22, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. David Kraslow and Stuart Loory, Diplomacy of Chaos (London: MacDonald, 1968) pp.129–33

    Google Scholar 

  16. and Mario Rossi, ‘U Thant and Vietnam: The Untold Story’ New York Review of Books, vol.17, no.8 (17 Nov. 1966) p.10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kenneth Lieberthal, A Research Guide to Central Party and Government Meetings in China, 1949–1975 (White Plains New York: International Arts and Science Press, 1976) pp.241–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Edgar Snow, ‘Mao Tse-tung and the Cost of Living’ The New Republic, vol.167, no.15 (10 April 1971) p.19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zagoria, Vietnam Triangle Moscow, Peking, Hanoi (New York: Pegasus, 1967) pp.83–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harold Wilson, The Labour Government 1964–70 (London: Penguin, 1974) p.445.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid, pp.199–200 and K.S. Karol, China’s Second Revolution (London: Jonathan Cape, 1975) p.394.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Gerald Segal

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Segal, G. (1982). The Vietnam War, 1963–8. In: The Great Power Triangle. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06059-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics