Skip to main content

The Unity of Felix Holt

  • Chapter
George Eliot

Abstract

The commentators on Felix Holt, the Radical have fallen for the most part into two groups, each more or less dissatisfied.1 There are those who, taking their cue from the title, expect the book to have a radical hero with effective political as well as personal quality, and the action to entail a modern political analysis of the structure of personality and society. Such readers are likely to conclude that Felix is an ineffective radical and ineffective hero, and that the action falls apart from that defective centre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. I am grateful to the National Endowment for the Humanities for the Fellowship that allowed me to write this paper. Quotations are taken from Felix Holt, ed. Peter Coveney (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. R. Leavis, The Great Tradition (London: Chatto & Windus, 1948), 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fred C. Thomson, ‘The Genesis of Felix Holt’, PMLA, 74 (1959), 576–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold Kettle sees the initial symmetry of action between ‘the Transome area’ and ‘the Lyon-Holt area’, but considers that from about the twelfth chapter the novel deteriorates because it loses sight of the issue of Felix’s radicalism. He assumes that Felix is the protagonist. (Arnold Kettle, ‘Felix Holt, the Radical’, Critical Essays on George Eliot, ed. Barbara Hardy [New York: Barnes & Noble; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970], pp. 99–115.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Carroll, who carries through to the end of the novel the parallels between Harold and Felix and sees Esther placed in the position of choosing between them, is still so far bound to the conventional reading that he finds Esther’s final choice of Felix an ‘anti-climax’ and considers that in the last third of the novel she has ‘usurped’ the ‘central position’ of the ‘titular hero’ and thrown the novel off balance! (David R. Carroll, ‘Felix Holt: Society as Protagonist’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 17 (1962), 237–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. George Eliot: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. George R. Creeger [Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970], pp. 124–40.)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Writing more recently, Laura Emory asserts the centrality of Esther’s role throughout the novel and the significance of her choice between Rufus Lyon and Mrs Transome as a parent, but Emory’s doggedly Freudian interpretation causes her to underestimate, in particular, the constructive role of Rufus Lyon. (Laura Comer Emory, George Eliot’s Creative Conflict: The Other Side of Silence [Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1976], 107 ff.)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A balanced view of the structure of the novel had been presented by Jerome Thale in The Novels of George Eliot (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959), and Peter Coveney in his Introduction to the Penguin edition has made a convincing case for the unity of Felix Holt in terms of Eliot’s poetic and political vision.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, e.g. W. J. Harvey, The Art of George Eliot (London: Chatto & Windus, 1961), pp. 131–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Craig, ‘Fiction and the Rising Industrial Classes’, Essays in Criticism, 17 (1967), 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. For an account of the assertion of ‘Gothic liberties’, see Samuel Kliger, The Goths in England: A Study in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Thought (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1952).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. V. S. Pritchett, The Living Novel (New York: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1947), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fred C. Thomson, ‘Felix Holt and Classical Tragedy’, Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 16 (1961), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1982 Gordon S. Haight and Rosemary T. VanArsdel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sandler, F. (1982). The Unity of Felix Holt. In: Haight, G.S., Van Arsdel, R.T. (eds) George Eliot. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05969-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics