Skip to main content

The Strategic Balance in the Arctic Ocean—Soviet Options

  • Chapter
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

Explorers and strategists have realised for decades that the Arctic had an immense, unutilised economic and strategic potential. This was not fully realised by governments, however, until after the Second World War. Changes in governmental attitudes have been gradual, but have resulted directly from new developments in political circumstances, arms technology, and, most recently, in the exploitability of Arctic mineral resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for instance, Sayre A. Swarztrauber ‘Alaska and Siberia: A Strategic Analysis’, Naval Review, US Naval Institute, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Boyle, ‘Arctic Passages North America’, US Naval Institute Proceedings (January 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrence Griwold, ‘The Cold Front’, Sea Power (Dec 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gerald E. Synhorst, ‘Soviet Strategic Interest in the Maritime Arctic’, US Naval Institute Proceedings (May 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for instance, Johan Jørgen Holst, ‘Northern Europe in the Process of European Security’, NUPI/N-45, May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted from Donat Pharand, The Law of the Sea of the Arctic with Special Reference to Canada (Ottawa 1973), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  7. James Calvert, Surface at the Pole. The Extraordinary Voyages of the USS Skate (New York, 1960), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  8. James L. Dyson, The World of Ice (London, 1963), p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ragnar Thorén, Picture Atlas of the Arctic (Amsterdam, 1969), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See John E. Sater, The Arctic Basin (Washington, 1963), p. 235. See also the 1969 edition of the same book.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ulf Samuelson, ‘The Arctic and its Role in World Affairs’. Unpublished manuscript, London 1970, pp. 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tønne Huitfeldt, ‘A Strategic Perspective on the Arctic’, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. ix, Nos. 2–3 (1974), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. John L. Helm, ‘Freighter Submarine Tankers’, Fifth National Northern Development Conference Proceedings, 4–6 Nov 1970, Edmonton, Alberta, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knut Endresen, ‘Ubåtnavigasjon’ Forsvarets Forum, No. 2 (1969), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Thorén, Picture Atlas of the Arctic (Amsterdam, 1969). See also J. E. Sater, op. cit., pp. 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  16. US Navy Electronic Laboratory, ‘Omega Navigation System’, Bureau of Ships Journal, Vol. 14 (Jan 1965), p. 8. See also R. Thorén, op. cit., and J. E. Sater, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Philip J. Klass, ‘Soviets Using Omega-like Navaid System’, Aviation Week and Space Technology, No. 22, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Blanchard, ‘Navigation by Satellite’, Wireless World, February 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. John D. Nicolaides, ‘The Navigation Satellite’, in Fredrik I. Ordway III (ed.), Advances in Space Science and Technology, Vol. 5 (New York, 1963), p. 167. The frequency of navigational signals received by a ship at the North Pole, as computed by Nicolaides, is based only on four satellites in polar orbit.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peter Wadsham: ‘A British Submarine Expedition to the North Pole, 1976’ in Polar Record, Vol. 18, No. 116 (1977), pp. 487–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. D. McWethy, ‘Significance of the Nautilus Polar Cruise’, US Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 84, No. 5 (May 1958), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. J. Ruhe, ‘Seapower in the Seventies’, US Naval Institute Proceedings, Naval Review, 1969, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kosta Tsipis, ‘Antisubmarine Warfare — Fact and Fiction’, New Scientist, 16 January 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jim Bussert; ‘Computers Add New Effectiveness to Sosus/Caesar’, Defence Electronics (Oct 1979) p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. H. Falls, ‘Security in the North’ in Nils Orvik (ed.), Policies of Northern Development (Kingston, 1973), p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. H. Falls, op. cit. See also Manne Wängborg, Militär doktrin och politikk i Sovjetunionen (Stockholm, 1974), pp. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quoted from Norman Polmar, Atomic Submarines (New Jersey, 1963), pp. 163–4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Nekhamkin, ‘On Board a Nuclear Submarine’, Soviet Union, No. 19–59, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  29. V. D. Sokolovski, Soviet Military Strategy (Santa Monica, 1963), p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Christer Fredholm, ‘The North Atlantic: The Norwegian Sea, a Scandinavian Security Problem’, Naval War College Review, Vol. xxiv, No. 9 (1972), p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1982 William Gutteridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Østreng, W. (1982). The Strategic Balance in the Arctic Ocean—Soviet Options. In: Gutteridge, W. (eds) European Security, Nuclear Weapons and Public Confidence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05908-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics