Abstract
In the closing stages of the Commons debate on the first Television Bill (see Volume 1) opposition speakers were unhappy about the vague generality of the programme control duties of the proposed Authority. They wanted these to be more precisely defined, and subjected to regular Parliamentary check on their proper fulfilment. The Government reply, that what was offensive to public feeling could not be other than what the Authority judged to be offensive and that ‘due impartiality’ would be what the Authority deemed duly impartial, left them uneasy. As with Humpty Dumpty, words were to mean what it chose them to mean. However, with the growth and spread of the itv service it became increasingly clear that a workable interpretation of statutory duties could only be reached in ad hoc day-to-day dealings between ita and companies in relation to particular television programmes and the problems that these raised in practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1983 Independent Broadcasting Authority and Independent Television Companies Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sendall, B. (1983). Due Impartiality. In: Independent Television in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05899-0_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05899-0_32
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-05901-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05899-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)