The Mercantilist Mind in Seventeenth-Century Portugal

  • Carl A. Hanson

Abstract

Portuguese mercantilist thought usually ran parallel to, if somewhat behind, that of the rest of western Europe. During the seventeenth century, Portuguese writers joined in the general movement away from so-called bullionism toward attempts at describing how a favorable balance of trade could be created through appropriate commercial policy.1 (Bullionism was the simplistic belief that national wealth could be increased merely by accumulating precious metals and maintained by preventing their export.) During the last third of that century, Portuguese mercantilist writers and policy makers gave increased attention to improving the balance of trade by encouraging domestic manufacturing. This effort was primarily inspired by the example of French manufacturing. The aim of preserving and increasing the supply of bullion, however, had not changed. The approaches to this end only became more sophisticated. Though the mercantilist mind in Portugal was in the mainstream of European economic thought, its thinking was quite naturally conditioned by the problems, limitations, and potentialities of the Portuguese economy.

Keywords

Sugar Europe Shipping Income Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Eli Heckscher, Mercantilism, 2nd ed., 2 vols., trans. Mendel Shapiro (New York: Macmillan, 1955), 2:296.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The best exposition of this controversy is in D. C. Coleman, ed., Revisions in Mercantilism (London: Meuthuen, 1969), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    This position is the one usually taken by Marxian writers. See, for example, Maurice Dobb, Studies in the Development of Capitalism (New York: International Publishers, 1947), p. 209.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Shepard B. Clough and Richard T. Rapp, European Economic History, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969), p. 206.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    J. H. Elliott, Imperial Spain, 1469–1716 (New York: New American Library, Mentor Books, 1966), p. 296.Google Scholar
  6. For a discussion of the efforts at reform in Spain during the period examined in the present study, see Mario L. Sánchez, “The Attempts at Reform in the Spain of Charles II: A Revisionist View of the Decline of Castile, 1665–1700” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Notre Dame, 1976).Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    António Sérgio, Antológia dos Economistas Portugueses (Século XVII) (Lisbon: Sá da Costa, 1974), pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    The others were Manuel Severim de Faria, Duarte Ribeiro de Macedo, Alexandre Gusmão, and D. Luís da Cunha. See Moses Bensabat Amzalak, Do Estudo da Evolução das Doutrinas Económicas em Portugal (Lisbon: Oficina Gráfica do Museu Comercial, 1928), p. 25.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    José Calvet de Magalhães, História do Pensamento Económico em Portugal (Coimbra: Imprensa de Universidade, 1967), pp. 211–12.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    José Acursio das Neves, Noções Históricas, Economicas e Administrativas sobre a Pro-ducção e Manufactura das Sedas em Portugal (Lisbon: Impressão Regia, 1827), pp. 8, 12–14.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Ibid., pp. 217–18. Also see Moses B. Amzalak, Uma Carta de Duarte Gomes ao Duque de Lerma (Lisbon: Gráfica Lisbonense, 1943).Google Scholar
  12. 23.
    Vitorino Guimarães, As Finanças na Guerra da Restauração (1640–1668) (Lisbon: Tipografia da L.C.G.G., 1941), p. 29.Google Scholar
  13. 27.
    René Gonnard, Les Doctrines Mercantilistes au XVII e Siècle en Portugal (Paris: Librairie de Sciences Economiques et Sociales, 1935), p. 8.Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    For an introduction to the literature on the tragic voyages of Portuguese Indiamen, see James Duffy, Shipwreck and Empire, Being an Account of Portuguese Maritime Disasters in a Century of Decline (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 31.
    Joel Serrão, “Conspecto histórico da emigração portuguesa,” Analise Social 8 (Lisbon, 1970):601.Google Scholar
  16. 34.
    Charles R. Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624–1654 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957), pp. 237–41.Google Scholar
  17. 38.
    The crown did in fact take steps to establish such a bank, but nothing came of them. See Andrade e Silva, Collecção, 7:107, 371; Magalhães, Pensamento Económico, pp. 251–52. Also see, Ivan Lins, Aspectos do Padre António Vieira, 2nd. ed. (Rio de Janeiro: Livraria São José, 1962), pp. 117–25.Google Scholar
  18. 41.
    In 1648, a law setting a tonnage minimum (350 toneladas) was passed for ships being built for trade with the colonies. This was done to limit the number of small, easily captured vessels at sea. The law also contained specifications for sturdier construction. Andrade e Silva, Collecção, 7:3. More on shipbuilding in Brazil can be found in Boxer, Salvador de Sá, pp. 307–10, 330–32. For a discussion of Vieira’s views on black slavery, see António José Saraiva, “Le Père Antonio Vieira S.J. et la question de l’esclavage de Noirs au XVIIe siècle,” Annales: ESC 6 (1967):1289–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 46.
    The literature on the Dutch foothold in the Brazilian northeast is quite extensive, but probably the best studies are Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil, 1624–1654’, and Evaldo Cabral de Mello, Olinda Restaurado: Guerra e Açucar no Nordeste, 1630–1654 (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense-Universitaria, 1975).Google Scholar
  20. 47.
    Charles W. Cole, French Mercantilist Doctrines before Colbert (New York: Richard R. Smith, 1931), pp. 214–15.Google Scholar
  21. 48.
    Charles W. Cole, Colbert and a Century of French Mercantilism, 2 vols. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1939), 1:164, 160–61.Google Scholar
  22. 53.
    Ibid., 1:355. Furthermore, Colbert regarded the course of economic life as being characterized by perpetual strife (un combat perpétual). Pierre Clement, ed., Lettres, instructions et memoires de Colbert, 10 vols. (Paris: Imprimerie Impériale, 1861–1882), 6:269.Google Scholar
  23. 54.
    David Ogg, Europe in the Seventeenth Century (New York: Collier Books, 1968), p. 286.Google Scholar
  24. 55.
    Moses B. Amzalak, A Economia Política em Portugal: O Diplomato Duarte Ribeiro de Macedo e os seus Discursos sobre Economia Política (Lisbon: Academia das sciencias de Lisboa, 1922), p. 5.Google Scholar
  25. 58.
    Further details of this marriage can be found in António Álvaro Dória, A Rainha D. Maria Francisca de Sabóia (1646–1683) (Porto: Livraria Civilização, 1944), p. 295.Google Scholar
  26. 59.
    Virginia Rau, “Cenas da vida parisiense na correspondência de Duarte Ribeiro de Macedo (1668–1676),” Bulletin des Études Portugaises, new series, 30 (Paris, 1969): 102–3.Google Scholar
  27. 65.
    Despite his disenchantment with the economic regime in Spain, Ribeiro de Macedo did study the writings of Spanish mercantilists, especially Sancho de Moncada. See José Larraz, La Epoca del Mercantilismo en Castille (1500–1700), 2nd ed. (Madrid: Atlas, 1943), p. 174.Google Scholar
  28. 78.
    Child, Brief Observations Concerning Trade, and the Interest of Money (1668)Google Scholar
  29. Fortrey, England’s Interest and Improvement (1663).Google Scholar
  30. The genesis of Child’s pamphlet, which later appeared as A New Discourse on Trade (1690), is examined in William Letwin, The Origins of Scientific Economics: English Economic Thought 1660–1776 (London: Methuen, 1963), pp. 5–42.Google Scholar
  31. 80.
    Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, Visão do Paraíso: Motivos Edênicas no Descobrimento e Colonização do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 1956), p. 201.Google Scholar
  32. 82.
    Duarate Ribeiro de Macedo, Obras Ineditas (Lisbon: Impressão Regia, 1817), p. 106.Google Scholar
  33. The story of Portugal’s loss of Sri Lanka is expertly told in George Davison Winius, The Fatal History of Portuguese Ceylon (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 86.
    Two translations of this work by Thomas Sprat were then in print: L’Histoire de la Société Royal de Londres (Geneva, 1669) and Histoire de l’Institution dessein et Progrès de la Société Royal de Londres (Paris, 1670). The famous society included among its earliest fellows António Álvares da Cunha (a Portuguese nobleman), Giuseppe de Faria (Pedro II’s ambassador), Gaspar Meres de Sousa (a Portuguese mathematician), Robert Southwell (ambassador to Portugal, 1665–1668), and a merchant in the Portugal trade named Goodwyn. See Thomas Birch, The History of the Royal Society of London, 4 vols., introduction by Rupert Hall (New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1968), 1 :xxxvii–xxxviii, xliii.Google Scholar
  35. 90.
    Charles C. Cumberland, Mexico: The Struggle for Modernity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
  36. 95.
    Virginia Rau, Política Económica e Mercantilismo na Correspondência de Duarte Ribeiro de Macedo (1668—1676), separata from Do Tempo e da Historia II (Lisbon: n.p., 1968), pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
  37. 98.
    Sousa Viterbo, A Armaria em Portugal (Lisbon: Academia Real das Sciencias, 1907), p. 67.Google Scholar
  38. 105.
    Rafael Bluteau, Vocabulario Português e Latino, 8 vols. (Coimbra: Collegio das Artes da Companhia de Jesu, 1712–1721); Supplemento, 2 vols. (Lisbon: José Antonio da Silva, 1727).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Minnesota 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl A. Hanson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations