Similarities and Differences in the Treatment of Labour Shortages

  • Jan Adam


The reasons for labour shortages and their treatment in individual countries are discussed in other chapters. This chapter is intended to be of comparative nature; it discusses the similarities and the differences in the reasons for labour shortages and their treatment, and the extent to which they reflect similarities and differences in the systems of management and their subsystems in the countries under review.


Economic Reform Average Wage Incentive System Wage Increase Wage Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. Pongrácz, Munkaügyi Szemle, Supplement ii (1977) and Panel discussion; Gospodarka planowa, no. 7–8 (1975) p. 411.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Timár, Közgazdasagi Szemle, no. 2 (1977) p. 132.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Timár, ‘The level of employment and its equilibrium in socialism’, Acta Oeconomica, 4(2) (1969)Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    L. Pachl, Plánované hospodářství, no. 12 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    and M. Kabaj, Praca i zabezpieczenia spoleczne, no. 1 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    See M. Kabaj, Życie gospodarcze, no. 41 (1979)Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    and Z. Glapa, Gospodarka planowa; no. 6 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    M. Kabaj, in a Polish panel debate on employment, Gospodarka planowa, no. 7–8 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    L. Sbytova, Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 6 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    See L. M. Danilov, in A. P. Volkov (ed.), Trud i zarabotnaia plata v SSSR (Moscow, 1975) pp. 160–3.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See also M. Ellman, ‘Full employment — lessons from state socialism’, De Economist, no. 4 (1979).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    In the USSR in 4 years (1929–32) the total number of employed workers almost doubled; compared to the original 5-year plan it increased almost 21/2 times (see M. Dobb, Soviet Economic Development since 1917 (London, 1966) pp. 239–40). Of course, such a rapid increase in employment dramatically reduced unemployment.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    See also H. H. Höhmann and G. Seidenstecher, in H. H. Hohmann (ed.), Arbeitsmarkt and Wirtschaftsplannung (Cologne, 1977) p. 41.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    A Polish economist talking about the first 6-year plan in Poland mentions that in many cases enterprises hired workers in such great numbers that the marginal value of output of the newly hired workers was very often less than the cost they incurred. W. Baka, Gospodarka planowa, no. 6 (1979).Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    See also G. Kruczkowska, Egalitaryzm a place (Warsaw, 1979) p. 147.Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    See J. Adam, Wage Control and Inflation in the Soviet Bloc Countries (London: Macmillan, 1979) pp. 40–3.Google Scholar
  17. 22.
    F. Munkácsy, Munkaügyi Szemle, no. 8 (1978).Google Scholar
  18. 23.
    N. Gorovskii, Sotsialisticheskii trud, no. 2 (1980) p. 12.Google Scholar
  19. 24.
    L. Pongrácz, Társadalmi Szemle, no. 4 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. 24.
    and A. Kemény, Práce a mzda, no. 3 (1971).Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    For more see J. Adam, ‘The incentive system in the USSR’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, no. 1 (1973).Google Scholar
  22. 27.
    See M. Ia. Sonin, EKO, no. 4 (1977)Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    N. Rogovskii, Planovoe khoziaistvo, no. 9 (1977).Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    Gorovskii, op. cit., p. 13, and K. Golinowski and N. Grzeszkowicz, Gospodarka planowa, no. 12 (1979).Google Scholar
  25. 29.
    M. Bartos, Práce a mzda, no. 10 (1970)Google Scholar
  26. 29.
    and V. Bakajsa, Práce a mzda, no. 9 (1976).Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    See Munkaügyi Szemle supplement iii (1976); Magyar Közlöny no. 7 (1976); Magyarország no. 2 (1977) and J. Czender and P. Mátyás, Munkaügyi Szemle no. 2 (1981).Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    M. Rybak, in A. Sajkiewicz (ed.), Ekonomika pracy (Warsaw, 1977) p. 81Google Scholar
  29. 32.
    and A. Kierczynski, Swoboda decyzji w organizacjach przemysiowych (Warsaw, 1979) p. 181.Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    K. Golinowski (Gospodarka planowa no. 9 (1977)) maintains that there are no limits in the material sphere.Google Scholar
  31. 34.
    E. Vincze, Munkaügyi Szemle, no. 12 (1976) and Munka, no. 1 (1977).Google Scholar
  32. 35.
    M. Kotek, Hospodářské noviny, no. 13 (1979).Google Scholar
  33. 38.
    In 1968, the tax was set at 8 per cent; in 1976 it was increased to 13 per cent. See O. Gadó, Közgazdasági szabályozó rendszerünk (Budapest, 1976) p. 24.Google Scholar
  34. 40.
    See J. Valach, Finance a finanční rozhodování průmyslovych podniků (Prague, 1972) p. 142.Google Scholar
  35. 41.
    M. Pick, Finance a úvér, no. 4 (1978).Google Scholar
  36. 42.
    See V. Sitnin, Chistii dokhod (Moscow, 1974) p. 172.Google Scholar
  37. 44.
    B. Csikós-Nagy, Magyar árpolitika (Budapest, 1980) pp. 126 and 128Google Scholar
  38. 44.
    and his ‘The Hungarian price reform’, The New Hungarian Quarterly, no. 76 (1979).Google Scholar
  39. 45.
    B. Gliński et al., Zmiany w systemie zarzgdzania (Warsaw, 1975) p. 59.Google Scholar
  40. 46.
    For more see J. Adam, Wage, Price and Taxation Policy in Czechoslovakia, 1948–1970 (Berlin, 1974) pp. 154–7.Google Scholar
  41. 47.
    J. Bokor, Pénzügyi Szemle, no. 12 (1973).Google Scholar
  42. 48.
    J. Adam, Wage Control…, op. cit., pp. 57–102; ‘Systems of wage regulation in the Soviet Bloc’, Soviet Studies, no. 1 (1976)Google Scholar
  43. 48.
    ‘The present incentive system in the USSR’, Soviet Studies, no. 3 (1980).Google Scholar
  44. 51.
    A. Rácz and L. Pongrácz, in Gazdasagi szabályozók, 1980 (Budapest, 1980) pp. 74–5.Google Scholar
  45. 52.
    L. Pongrácz, Munkaügyi Szemle, no. 8 (1980) p. 4.Google Scholar
  46. 58.
    I. Slavnyi, Dengi i kredit, no. 3 (1980) p. 41.Google Scholar
  47. 59.
    L. Gyetvai, Figyelö, no. 19 (1980).Google Scholar
  48. 62.
    In Hungary the tax rate on profits amounts to 40 per cent starting with 1979. See M. Dąbrowski, Gospodarka planowa, no. 12 (1979).Google Scholar
  49. 63.
    In Czechoslovakia it is 75 per cent; there are some exceptions to this rule which are stated in the law. See V. Sládek et al., Financie socialistických podnikov a odvetví (Bratislava, 1977) p. 144.Google Scholar
  50. 64.
    See Z. Fedorowicz, Finanse organizacji gospodarczych (Warsaw, 1977) pp. 135–43.Google Scholar
  51. 67.
    R. Nyers and M. Tardos, ‘Enterprise in Hungary before and after the economic reform’, Acta Oeconomica, 20 (1–2) (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jan Adam 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Adam

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations