Abstract
So far we have been considering models with formalisms which, while acknowledging some separateness and possibly also a hierarchy of goals pursued, are not fully explicit in dealing with the conflicts of interests, and in particular with respect to the mode of the hierarchic guidance of the process. To deal with this aspect it may be of use to discuss the possible organization of this process in the CMEA in game-theoretic and control-theoretic terms (1).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Footnotes
V.Ya. Pan, “Model optimizatsyi vneshneekonomicheskikh svyazey v uslovyakh ekonomicheskoy integratsyi sotsyalisticheskikh stran”, Ekonomika i Matematicheskiye Metody, no. 2, 1974.
V.A. Volkonskiy, Printsipy Optimalnogo Planirovanya, Moscow 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1980 The Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zauberman, A. (1980). Further Discussion of Modelling a Multi-economy System as a Game, Antagonistic or Nonantagonistic. In: Topics in Trade Coordination of Planned Economies. Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05753-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05753-5_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-05755-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05753-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)