The Existing Dependencies

  • L. S. Trachtenberg

Abstract

Eighty-five years later, things have come to be viewed differently from Chamberlain’s day and now we speak no longer of colonies but instead of dependent territories and associated states. But whatever the name, these actors are still a corporate part of the true spirit of kinship to which Chamberlain referred, a spirit which is today embodied in the Commonwealth. Along with the name by which we refer to these territorial actors, much has changed and evolved since 1897, but this basic spirit of fraternity which created the Commonwealth is as alive today as ever. These territories are no longer referred to as ‘ours’ and if anything the Commonwealth spirit has done a great deal to perpetuate itself through the rapid dismantling of Britain’s colonial possessions and the creation of the contemporary Commonwealth. But is the burgeoning membership of the Commonwealth in the best interests of the remaining dependencies?1

Keywords

Migration Europe Petroleum Shipping Argentina 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 2.
    Anthony Sampson, The Anatomy of Britain (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1962).Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    See W. Gilmore, ‘Requiem for Associated Statehood?’ in Review of International Studies, 8: 1 (January 1982), pp. 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 6.
    B. Coard, ‘The meaning of political independence in the Commonwealth Caribbean’ in Independence for Grenada — Myth or Reality? (St Augustine, Trinidad: Institute of International Relations, 1974) p. 70.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    T. B. Millar, The Commonwealth and the United Nations (Sydney: Sydney University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    J. D. B. Miller, The Commonwealth in the World, 3rd edn (London: Duckworth, 1965), pp. 271–3.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    Arnold Smith, Stitches in Time: The Commonwealth in World Politics (London: Andre Deutsch, 1981) p. 158.Google Scholar
  7. 16.
    Anthony Payne, Change in the Commonwealth Caribbean, Chatham House Papers No. 12 (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1981), and conversations between Mr Payne and the Author.Google Scholar
  8. 18.
    Ibid., For further details of this separation see W. J. Bush, Anguilla and the Mini-State Dilemma, Policy Paper No. 5 (New York: Center for International Studies, 1971).Google Scholar
  9. 25.
    Elmer Plischke, Micro-states in World Affairs: Policy Problems and Options (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1977) p. 9.Google Scholar
  10. 31.
    Alfred Cobban, The Nation-State and National Self Determination, revised edn (London: Collins, 1969) p. 280.Google Scholar
  11. 33.
    Commonwealth Heads of Government, The Melbourne Communiqué, October 1981 (London: Commonwealth Secretariat, 1981) paras 27, 35–7, 71–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© A. J. R. Groom and Paul Taylor 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. S. Trachtenberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations