Abstract
The writings of Freud appear to be applications of two basic principles of explanation. The first is a generalisation of our usual manner of explaining human actions and policies, in terms of the motives and intentions of their agents, to account for behaviour in cases where the agents themselves cannot thus account for it; where these motives and intentions are thus ‘unconscious’, but still supposed to exist and to operate. The second is a kind of reductionism which at times presupposes, and at times tries to demonstrate, that thinking is really only an indirect route to pleasure, and pleasure really only a matter of the release of tensions which have built up in the organs of the body. In terms of the distinction I suggested earlier,1 the first principle is a matter of extending B explanation to phenomena to which it had not previously been applied; the second of reducing B explanation to A explanation. The first principle surely represents one of the most important discoveries ever made in the human sciences. The second seems, on the contrary, for reasons which I have already given,1 to be almost entirely superstitious; due to an attempt to reconcile a great discovery with erroneous beliefs about the nature and implications of scientific explanation.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cf. p. 12 above.
Freud, Two short Accounts of Psychoanalysis (Harmondsworth, 1962) pp. 31–8, 41–2.
Freud, Two Short Accounts, pp. 42–4, 46–7.
Ibid., pp. 39, 43–4, 52–3, 56; ‘A Case of Hysteria’, Collected Works, vol. VII (London, 1953) p. 18. Cf. Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis (London, 1933) pp. 51–2.
From about 1915 onwards.
See p. 115 below.
Freud, Two Short Accounts, pp. 104–5, 108, 111; Introductory Lectures, p. 189; S. Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis’, Collected Works, vol. XXII (London, 1964) pp. 69–77. I have deliberately referred a good deal to this work, which gives Freud’s most mature and considered views on many aspects of psychoanalysis. Cf. Introductory Lectures, pp. 298–9.
Freud, Two Short Accounts, p. 137; ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 59–61, 79. Cf. Introductory Lectures, p. 357.
‘Anxiety’ is the accepted translation of Freud’s ‘Angst’, which suggests a rather more intense emotion than that conveyed by the English term.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 78, 93.
Cf. especially, S. Freud, The Psychopathology of Everyday Life (London, 1960).
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 95–7; Introductory Lectures, p. 17. Cf. S. Freud, ‘Instincts and Their Vicissitudes’, Collected Works, vol, XIV, pp. 118–25.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 97, 103–10.
S. Freud, ‘Three Essays on Sexuality’, Collected Works, vol. VII, pp. 182–3; ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 98–9.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 99–100; Two Short Accounts, p. 75. Introductory Lectures, p. 352. ‘Three Essays’, pp. 153–4, 157, 160, 182, 210–11.
Stuart Hampshire, in a review of The Freud-Jung Letters in the Observer, 14 April 1974.
Cf. ch. 3 above. I have avoided the term ‘instinct’, as this term is sometimes used with the meaning ‘predisposition to behaviour not at all subject to environmental influence’. At that rate, of course, man has few if any instincts, and certainly not a sexual one. However, I do not know of anyone who would seriously claim that much human behaviour is instinctive in that sense. Confusion on this point vitiates a lot of discussion of the important issue of the nature and strength of inherited predispositions to behaviour in man. For examples of such confusion, cf. Montague, Man and Aggression. Introduction and ch. 1.
Cf. K. Lorenz, Studies in Human and Animal Behaviour, vol. 2 (London, 1971) pp. 226–9.
Cf. p. 125. A certain unease on Freud’s part as to the nature of curiosity, and how it can be accounted for on the basis of allegedly more primitive ‘instincts’, is to be found in the passage quoted.
Cf. p. 16 above.
J. A. C. Brown, Freud and the Post-Freudians (Harmondsworth, 1961) p. 2.
See p. 106 above.
Cf. p. 110 above.
Ibid.
Cf. W. H. Thorpe, Animal Nature and Human Nature (London, 1974) pp. 218–29.
Cf. p. 109 above.
An example of the methods and results of such studies are provided by Thorpe’s discussion of bird song (Thorpe, Animal Nature, pp. 111–17).
Cf. pp. 47–51 above.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, p. 7.
Ibid., pp. 18–19.
S. Freud, ‘A Case of Hysteria’, Collected Works, vol. VII, pp. 15, 65, 71; Two Short Accounts, pp. 60–63; ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 11–12. Cf. S. Freud, The Interpretation of Dreams (London, 1954) pp. 121, 126, 127, 143–4, 160, 165, 277, 279, 284, 308.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 18–21, 23. Cf. Interpretation of Dreams, pp. 49, 279, 308, 344.
Freud, Introductory Lectures, pp. 181–2; ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 27–8; S. Freud, Beyond the Pleasure Principle (London, 1948) pp. 25, 39, 42. Cf. Interpretation of Dreams, p. 460.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, p. 12; Two Short Accounts, p. 62; Introductory Lectures, pp. 128–30. Cf. Interpretation of Dreams, pp. 345, 353, 360.
Freud, Introductory Lectures, pp. 129–33. Cf. Interpretation of Dreams, pp. 354–6.
The words in brackets form part of the quotation.
S. Freud, ‘The Acquisition and Control of Fire’, Collected Works, vol. XXII, p. 191.
‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 15–16; Introductory Lectures, p. 232.
Ibid., p. 133.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 22–3.
Cf. L. Dupré, The Other Dimension (New York, 1972) p. 161.
Cf. p. 121 above.
S. Freud, Totem and Taboo (London, 1950) pp. 141 – 61.
Cf. ch. 3 above.
Freud, Two Short Accounts, pp. 71, 76–8.
Freud, ‘A Case of Hysteria’, Collected Works, vol. VII, p. 50; Two Short Accounts, pp. 74, 81; ‘Three Essays’, pp. 194, 239; ‘New Introductory Lectures’, p. 100.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 61–4, 67–8. Cf. S. Freud, ‘Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego’, Collected Works, vol. XVIII (London, 1955) p. 116.
Freud, Two Short Accounts, pp. 80–1; ‘Three Essays’, p. 165.
Freud, ‘Three Essays’, p. 236; Introductory Lectures, pp. 302, 360.
Freud, Introductory Lectures, pp. 307–9.
Ibid., pp. 291–2, 301–2; Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 120, 122, 126; Freud, ‘A Case of Hysteria’. Collected Works, vol. VII, pp. 40, 42.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 86–8. Cf. Totem and Taboo, pp. 141, 153.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 116–20.
On this ‘symbolic equivalence’, cf. pp. 156–7 below.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 120–22, 124–6, 128.
Melanie Klein claims, on the contrary, and surely with at least equal plausibility, that the superego in women is especially strongly developed. Cf. Klein, The Psychoanalysis of Children (London, 1949) p. 316.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 129, 134–5; ‘Three Essays’, pp. 219, 221.
Freud, Introductory Lectures, pp. 368–74, 380–1. Psychotics cannot redirect libido, according to Freud, and so have no capacity to undergo the transference.
Freud, Two Short Accounts, pp. 135ff; Introductory Lectures, pp. 384–5.
S. Freud, Civilisation and its Discontents (London, 1930) pp. 20–3, 25, 35, 91.
Cf. S. Freud, The Future of an Illusion (London, 1927) pp. 12, 30, 50, 54, 56–7.
Freud, Civilisation and its Discontents, pp. 90–1; ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 110–11.
Freud, Civilisation and its Discontents, p. 143.
Freud, ‘New Introductory Lectures’, pp. 159–61, 163, 167.
Ibid., pp. 170–2.
Ibid., pp. 178–81.
Cf. pp. 122–4 above.
An admirably clear summary of the results of such an investigation is provided by E. H. Erikson, ‘Growth and Crises of the Healthy Personality’ in R. S. Lazarus and E. M. Opton (eds), Personality (Harmondsworth, 1970).
Cf. Freud’s ‘Leonardo da Vinci and a Memory of his Childhood’, Collected Works, vol. XI (London, 1957).
Cf. p. 126 above.
See p. 114 above.
Cf. p. 127 above.
Cf. p. 132 above.
Cf. ch. 7, pp. 178, 189–90 below.
C. G. Jung, ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, Collected Works, vol. 4 (London, 1961) p. 125; ‘Symbols of Transformation’, Collected Works, vol. 5 (London, 1956) pp. 128–31, 136.
Cf. Jung, ‘Two Essays on Analytical Psychology’, Collected Works, vol. 7 (London, 1956) p. 263; ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, pp. 112, 118–19, 125.
Jung, ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, pp. 113, 153–4, 197; Jung, ‘The Psychogenesis of Mental Disease’, Collected Works, vol. 3 (London, 1960) pp. 204–5, 207–8;
Jung, ‘Mysterium Coniunctionis’, Collected Works, vol. 14 (London, 1963) p. xv.
C. G. Jung, ‘Psychology and Religion’, Collected Works, vol. 11 (London, 1958) pp. 76, 82, 179; ‘Mysterium Coniunctionis’, p. 520.
Jung, ‘Symbols of Transformation’, p. 297; ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, pp. 95–6, 134, 136–7, 179.
Jung, ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, pp. 168–70, 183, 209.
Jung, ‘Psychology and Religion’, p. 179; ‘Mysterium Coniunctionis’, pp. 474, 499, 520.
Jung, ‘Symbols of Transformation’, pp. 235, 304, 335, 356, 417; ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, pp. 155–6.
Jung, ‘Symbols of Transformation’, pp. 292–3; ‘Two Essays’, pp. 160, 182; ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, pp. 180, 184–5.
Jung, ‘Two Essays’, p. 192.
Jung, ‘Symbols of Transformation’, p. 141; Jung, ‘The Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious’, Collected Works, vol. 9, part 1 (London, 1959) pp. 277–8; ‘Psychogenesis of Mental Disease’, p. 219; ‘Two Essays’, pp. 235–6. Cf. ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, p. 202.
C. G. Jung, Psychological Types (London, 1923) p. 412.
Cf. H. J. Eysenck, Dimensions of Personality (London, 1950) passim;
A. Storr, Jung (London, 1973) p. 77.
Jung, ‘Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, p. 354; ‘Mysterium Coniunctionis’, p. 473.
Jung, ‘Symbols of Transformation’, pp. 97, 141.
Jung, ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, p. 201; ‘Two Essays’, p. 177; Frieda Fordham, An Introduction to Jung’s Psychology (Harmondsworth, 1959) p. 103.
Jung, ‘Two Essays’, p. 110; ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, p. 146.
Cf. p. 146 above.
Jung, ‘Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, p. 18; ‘Symbols of Transformation’, pp. 328, 396, 438–9; ‘Psychology and Religion’, pp. 166–7, 189–90.
Jung, ‘Psychogenesis of Mental Disease’, pp. 241 – 2; ‘Psychology and Religion’, p. 289.
The Supplement (1976) to the Oxford English Dictionary describes the ‘mandala’ as follows: ‘a symbolic representation of a magic circle usually with symmetrical divisions and figures of deities, etc., in the centre, used by Buddhists in meditation and found in many cultures as a religious symbol.’
Jung,’Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, pp. 10, 352, 357, 360–1; Jung and Kerenyi, Essays on a Science of Mythology (London, 1951) p. 18.
Jung, ‘Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, pp. 125–7, 130; ‘Symbols of Transformation’, p. 345; ‘Psychology and Religion’, pp. 273, 294–5. Cf. Jung, ‘Psychology and Alchemy’, Collected Works, vol. 12 (London, 1953) p. 18.
Jung, ‘Psychology and Religion’, pp. 104–5, 294.
Cf. Calvin S. Hall and Vernon J. Nordby, A Primer of Jungian Psychology (New York and London, 1973) pp. 23, 36–8.
Jung, ‘Symbols of Transformation’, pp. 102, 294. Cf. ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, p. 151; ‘Mysterium Coniunctionis’, p. xix; ‘Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, pp. 66, 79; ‘Two Essays’, p. 93. Cf. also the following from Jung’s ‘Civilisation in Transition’, Collected Works, vol. 10, cited by J. Jacobi, Complex/Archetype/Symbol (New York, 1959), p. 37; ‘Archetypes ... are systems of readiness for action, and at the same time images and emotions. They are inherited with the brain structure — indeed they are its psychic aspect.’
Jung, ‘Two Essays’, pp. 76, 93; ‘Mysterium Coniunctionis’, p. 523; ‘Psychogenesis of Mental Disease’, p. 262.
Jung, ‘Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, pp. 39, 285; ‘Two Essays’, p. 205; ‘Psychology and Religion’, p. 30; ‘Mysterium Coniunctionis’, p. 186. Cf. Hall and Nordby, Primer, pp. 46–8.
The success of Alf Garnett seems to illustrate the point.
Jung, ‘Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, pp. 260, 264–5; Hall and Nordby, Primer, pp. 49–51, citing Jung’s ‘Civilisation in Transition’.
Jung, ‘Symbols of Transformation’, pp. 277, 347, 382, 383; Jung and Kerenyi, Essays, pp. 38, 48–9; Jung, ‘Archetypes of Collective Unconscious’, pp. 117, 218, 221, 225, 227, 270.
Jung, ‘Freud and Psychoanalysis’, p. 26. The difference between the thesis that all psychic phenomena are meaningful on the one hand, and psychic determinism on the other, is crucial. J. A. C. Brown, Freud and the Post-Freudians, p. 191, writes: ‘By the single assumption of psychic determinism, Freud brought every manifestation of the irrational into the sphere of psychic investigation.’ But it seems that the correct assumption, which underlies Freud’s real discoveries as opposed to his mistakes, is that such phenomena are meaningful rather than that they are determined. For a useful discussion of this question, cf. Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy (New Haven and London, 1970).
Cf. p. 121 above.
Cf. p. 152 above.
Cf. p. 140 above.
Cf. p. 127 above.
Cf. pp. 140–1 above; and many examples from Freud’s The Psychopathology of Everyday Life.
Cf. p. 134 above.
Cf. pp. 150–1 above.
J. A. C. Brown, Freud and the Post-Freudians, p. 43. It is only fair to add that Brown does not content himself with this suggestion, but goes on to argue, erroneously as I have suggested, that Freud is far more scientific than Jung.
Cf. p. 113 above.
K. Lorenz, Studies in Animal and Human Behaviour, vol. 2 (London, 1971) pp. 164–88.
Copyright information
© 1981 Hugo Meynell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meynell, H. (1981). The Corrupt Individual Consciousness: Freud and Jung. In: Freud, Marx and Morals. New Studies in Practical Philosophy. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05640-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05640-8_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-05642-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05640-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)