Abstract
‘It will be generally admitted that Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony is the most sublime noise that has ever penetrated into the ear of man.’ That, of course, is the well-known opening of, appropriately, the fifth chapter of Howards End. Forster’s biographer, P. N. Furbank, has suggested that this passage and what follows recall a dialogue written in 1904, six years earlier, by Forster’s friend and. mentor, Goldsworthy Lowes Dickinson.1 In that piece, a poet returns in an exalted mood from hearing this same music, and finds himself attacked by two friends, a musician and a painter who resembles Roger Fry, for using music as a substitute for living. In his defence, the poet offers an allegorical interpretation of the Beethoven that is not unlike that offered by Helen Schlegel in the novel: goblins and elephants, ‘panic and emptiness’. Forster’s use of Beethoven in this novel is worth stressing in conjunction with Dickinson, Fry, and the possible functions of music if only because when we think of Bloomsbury and its Cambridge roots, it seems more natural to think of literature, and perhaps even painting, than it is to think of music. Yet the images and structures of that third art significantly inform the writings, both critical and creative, not just of Forster, but also of other members of the Bloomsbury Group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
P. N. Furbank, E. M. Forster: A Life (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977 ), I, 173.
E. M. Forster, ‘The Raison d’Etre of Criticism’, Two Cheers for Democracy, ed. Oliver Stallybrass, Abinger edn. ( London: Edward Arnold, 1972 ), p. 105.
E. M. Forster, Abinger Harvest ( London: Edward Arnold, 1936 ), p. 84.
Roger Fry, The Artist and Psycho-analysis Hogarth Essays (London: Hogarth Press, 1928), p. 292, italics his.
Charles Mauron, Sagesse de l’eau ( Paris: Laffont, 1945 ), p. 42.
G. E. Moore, Principia Ethica (1903; rpt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922 ), p. 188.
Charles Mauron, L’Homme triple ( Paris: R. Laffont, 1947 ).
Charles Mauron, Aesthetics and Psychology (London: Hogarth Press, 1935), pp. 82, 84, italics his.
Stephen Spender, ‘Imagination is Personal’, The Struggle of the Modern ( London: Methuen, 1963 ), p. 48.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1982 Judith Scherer Herz and Robert K. Martin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hutcheon, L. (1982). ‘Sublime Noise’ for Three Friends: Music in the Critical Writings of E. M. Forster, Roger Fry and Charles Mauron. In: Herz, J.S., Martin, R.K. (eds) E. M. Forster: Centenary Revaluations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05625-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05625-5_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-05627-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05625-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)