Skip to main content
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

The major theme we started with and kept coming back to was ‘authority’ and especially, though not only, authority in broadcasting. It is worth recalling that broadcasting is the one medium of communication on which all nation states took conscious thought before they set up systems. The first reason for this was that resources were limited, channels were limited; by comparison, printing outlets are potentially infinite. So governments had to decide in advance; but of course how they decided to set up broadcasting, how they financed it, what structures they gave it, reflected the different natures of different societies. Many wanted to keep their hands on it, to be able to censor it; but the universally applicable reason for governmental intervention from the start was shortage of resources. Yet it is now possible to say that that shortage is about to disappear — this is why we are all aware of being at a kind of watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bad Mews, Glasgow University Media Group (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Richard Hoggart Janet Morgan

Copyright information

© 1982 The Foundations of Broadcasting Policy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoggart, R., Morgan, J. (1982). Richard Hoggart. In: Hoggart, R., Morgan, J. (eds) The Future of Broadcasting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05440-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics