Skip to main content

Coexistence and diversity in Heteromyid rodents

  • Chapter
  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

David Lack’s interest in coexisting avian seed eaters was extraordinarily seminal. His work, Darwin’s Finches (1947), suggested that several species of this family might be avoiding competitive exclusion by virtue of their dissimilar beak sizes. A likely hypothesis seemed to be that each beak size is specialised for a particular range of seed sizes (Bowman, 1961). Theories have since been developed that explain how this might come about (see, for example, MacArthur and Pianka, 1966; Emlen, 1966). In general they may be summarised by noting that they all require a trade-off in adaptiveness: the phenotype that is well adapted to utilising one portion of a resource spectrum is, perforce, poorly adapted for other portions of it. In the case of granivores, this might mean that, for a bird of given size, hulling over-large seeds is too costly in time or energy, and small seeds are too unrewarding, to be profitable. MacArthur and MacArthur (1972) have shown that this is probably true for certain American birds.

Michael L. Rosenzweig received his Ph.D. in zoology from the University of Pennsylvania in 1966. Robert H. MacArthur and W. John Smith were his preceptors. His research has centred on population interactions, particularly on theoretical aspects of exploitation and competition in rodents. Having held positions at the University of New Mexico, SUNY-Albany, and Bucknell University, He is currently Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, at the University of Arizona.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, L. W. (1942). Notes on the life history of the Sand pocket mice. J. Mammal., 23, 339–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, J. C. (1969). Dependence of desert rodents on winter annuals and precipitation. Ecology, 50, 721–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, W. (1937). Burrow and food habits of the Prairie pocket mouse. J. Mammal, 18, 188–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, R. I. (1961). Morphological differentiation and adaptation in the Galapagos finches. Univ. Cal. Publ. Zool., 58, 1–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H. (1975). Geographical ecology of desert rodents, in “Ecology and Evolution of Communities” (eds. M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond.) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 315–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H. and Lieberman, G. A. (1973). Resource utilisation and coexistence of seed eating desert rodent in sand dune habitats. Ecology, 54, 788–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K. (1973). Two cases of resource partitioning in an intertidal community: making the right prediction for the wrong reasons. Am. Nat., 107, 662–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, M. (1968). A comparative food habit study of two species of kangaroo rats, Dipodomys ordii and Dipodomys merriami. M.S. thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. 25 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M. (1966). The role of time and energy in food preference. Am. Nat., 100, 611–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. L., Jr (1970). On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor., 19, 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, C. E., Reichman, O. J. and Van de Graeff, K. M. (1973). Diet, food preferences and reproductive cycles of some desert rodents. Research Memorandum, RM 73–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D. L. (1947). Darwin’s Finches. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1962). Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. I. The fitness set and adaptive function. Am. Nat., 96, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenagy, G. J. (1972). Saltbush leaves: excision of hyper-saline tissue by a kangaroo rat. Science, 178, 1094–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and MacArthur, D. (1972). Efficiency and preference at a bird feeder. J. Ariz. Acad. Sci., 7, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., Recher, H. and Cody, M. (1966). On the relation between habitat selection and species diversity. Am. Nat., 100, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and Levins, R. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat., 101, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. and Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat., 100, 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. and MacArthur, R. H. (1972). Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 69, 1109–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monson, G. (1943). Food habits of the Bannertailed Kangaroo Rat in Arizona. J. Wildl. Mngmt., 7, 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H. G. (1950). Relation of Merriam Kangaroo Rats to range vegetation in southern Arizona. Ecology, 31, 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H. G. and Haskell, H. S. (1949). Life history notes on Price and Bailey Pocket Mice of southern Arizona. J. Mammal., 301, 150–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1973). Habitat selection experiments with a pair of coexisting heteromyid rodent species. Ecology, 54, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. (1974). On the evolution of habitat selection. In Proc. 1st Int. Congr. Ecology, 401–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L., Smigel, B. and Kraft, A. (1975). Patterns of food, space and diversity, in Rodents in Desert Environments. (eds. I. Prakash and P. Ghosh), Monographiae Biologicae, 28, Dr W. Junk, by, The Hague. 241–268.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L., and Sterner, P. (1970). Population ecology of desert rodent communities: body size and seed-husking as bases for heteromyid coexistence. Ecology, 51, 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L. and Winakur, J. (1969). Population ecology of desert rodent communities: habitat and environmental complexity. Ecology, 50, 558–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, G., and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1975). Perturbation analysis of competition and overlap in habitat utilisation between Dipodomys ordii and Dipodomys merriami. Oecologia, 19, 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. T. (1934). The ability of the giant kangaroo rat as a harvester and storer of seeds. J. Mammal., 15, 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherbrooke, W. C. (1976). Differential acceptance of toxic jojoba seed (Simmondsia chinensis) by four Sonoran desert heteromyid rodents. Ecology, 57, 596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smigel, B. W. and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1974). Seed selection in Dipodomys merriami and Perognathus penicillatus. Ecology, 55, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Went, F. W. and Westergaard, M. (1949). Ecology of desert plants. III. Development of plants in the Death Valley National Monument, California. Ecology, 30, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1977 The contributors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenzweig, M.L. (1977). Coexistence and diversity in Heteromyid rodents. In: Stonehouse, B., Perrins, C. (eds) Evolutionary Ecology. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05226-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics