Skip to main content
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

In the 1901–2 period Conrad wrote five stories, including two of his great tales, ‘Typhoon’ and ‘The End of the Tether’. While the former was published with ‘Falk: A Reminiscence’, ‘Amy Foster’, and ‘Tomorrow’ in Typhoon (1903), the latter appeared with ‘Youth’ and ‘Heart of Darkness’ in Youth (1902). ‘Falk: A Reminiscence’ and ‘Amy Foster’ reflect Conrad’s continuing interest in the epistemological quest of a dramatised first person narrator. But the other tales are significant departures in their exploration of the possibilities of the omniscient voice. When Conrad discovered that he did not want to dramatise exclusively subjective states of mind, he turned again to the omniscient narrator. Although Conrad had used a primitive version of that voice in his first two novels and in a few of his early stories, he now learned in these stories how to control the readers’ responses by means of subtle modulations of tone, changing perspectives, deft withholding of crucial information, and manipulation of chronology. Conrad originally experimented with these techniques when writing his Marlow tales. But he still had to adopt them to the omniscient voice that he preferred when he was examining a panoramic situation or when he knew exactly what he thought about the central dramatic situation of a work. As we shall see, much of the art of the next two novels, Nostromo and The Secret Agent, depends upon the subtlety and control of the omniscient voice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In his Conrad: A Reassessment (Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes, 1952), Douglas Hewitt suggests that the title figure’s effect on the narrator is an extremely important part of ‘Falk: A Reminiscence’ (pp. 40–5). Despite his penetrating comments, the disregard of the narrator’s role has led to the misunderstanding and relative neglect of this excellent tale. See also Bruce Johnson, ‘Conrad’s “Falk”: Manuscript and Meaning’, Modern Language Quarterly, vol. xxvi (June 1965). In his important article Johnson underestimates the importance of the narrator’s relationship with Falk and thus writes that ‘the story is ill-suited for the intellectual and emotional burden it simultaneously carries and avoids’ (p. 276).

    Google Scholar 

  2. John A. Lester, jun., Journey Through Despair 1890–1914: Transformations in British Literary Culture ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968 ), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In a splendid article, Robert Andreach, ‘The Two Narrators of “Amy Foster”’, Studies in Short Fiction, vol. ii (1965), pp. 262–9, argues that Dr Kennedy diminishes his own guilt. Karl discusses the biographical implications of Amy Foster’, particularly the ‘exogamous marriage, a continuing aspect of Conrad’s work’. See Joseph Conrad: The Three Lives pp. 513–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Howard Wills, ‘Conrad’s ‘Typhoon’: A Triumph in Organic Art’, North Dakota Quarterly, vol. xxx (1962), pp. 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For views of women and sexuality in the period, see Hynes, The Edwardian Turn of Mind (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968) chaps. 5,6, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See William Moynihan, ‘Conard’s “The End of the Tether”: A New Reading’, Modern Fiction Studies, vol. iv (Summer 1958), pp. 173–7;

    Google Scholar 

  7. reprinted in Robert W. Stallman, The Art of Joseph Conrad: A Critical Symposium (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1960), pp. 186–91; See pp. 187–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William Blackburn (ed.), Joseph Conrad: Letters to William Blackwood and David S. Meldrum (Durham: Duke University Press, 1958), Autumn, 1902, pp. 169–70.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. Willard Trask (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953 ), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kenneth Burke, The Philosophy of Literary Form, rev. ed. (New York: Vintage, 1957 ), P. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lawrence Graver, Conrad’s Short Fiction (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969) argues that Whalley’s end is not heroic, for ‘Whalley, like Kurtz, sees the horror of his life and his memory perpetuated by an enormous lie’ (p.118; see pp. 113–19).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 Daniel R. Schwarz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwarz, D.R. (1980). Conrad’s shorter fiction: 1901–1902. In: Conrad: Almayer’s Folly to Under Western Eyes. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05189-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics