Abstract
The predominant endemic political rivalry in early Victorian cities was not the potentially explosive conflict between bourgeoisie and proletariat but a struggle for supremacy within the urban middle class itself. The larger cities were characterized by a diverse and fragmented social structure which produced a rather amorphous class of superior craftsmen and tradesmen, retailers and providers of a variety of services who blurred the class lines between the owners and servants of capital. In a sense these groups together with the embryonic proletariat were spectators to a struggle for power among their social superiors and were invited to side with one or other of the contenders. The battle lines were drawn along three contours. Family was of crucial importance in English social organization and the urban struggle for power was often a rivalry between traditional long-established ruling families and newly-founded dynasties, commonly the product of go-ahead migrants to the town. This new-man/old-man conflict was exacerbated by religious divisions, for the traditional ruling families were almost exclusively Anglican and the rising newcomers predominantly, though not exclusively, Dissenters. Political affiliation confirmed the contest for power and the traditional Tory urban establishment found itself opposed by Whig-Liberal or radical challengers. Family, religion, and politics produced a battle between the insider and the outsider, the ins and the outs.
‘Every year there will be that delightful agitation which I love to see — an election of one common council man for every ward — just enough to remind the other two, if they don’t behave themselves that their turn is coming ... I tell you in all frankness that I think the Corporation Act the most democratic measure upon our statute book.’ Richard Cobden, 1838
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. W. Greaves, The Corporation of Leicester (1939), 86.
E. P. Hennock, Fit and Proper Persons (1973), 185.
W. E. A. Axon, Cobden as a Citizen (1907), 89.
J. Morley, The Life of Richard Cobden (1908), 124.
Quoted by S. D. Simon, A Century of City Government (1938), 98.
Cf. D. Fraser, papers in Publications of the Thoresby Society, Liii (1970). 1–70.
C. Scarborough, To the Chairman… in the East Ward (1837); Leeds Intelligences, 18 April 1888.
Cf. J. Redlich and F. W. Hirst, The History of Local Government in England (1970 edn), 181.
J. S. Curtis, The Story of the Marsden Mayoralty (1875), 1.
Cf. C. D. Watkinson, ‘The Liberal Party on Merseyside in the Nineteenth Century’ ( Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, 1967 ).
H. M. Walmsley, The Life of Joshua Walmsley (1879), 91.
S. G. Checkland, The Gladstones A Family Biography (1972), 336.
J. T. Bunce, History of the Corporation of Birmingham I (1878), 287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1976 Leicester University Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fraser, D. (1976). Council politics. In: Urban Politics in Victorian England. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05137-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05137-3_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-27885-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05137-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)