Abstract
Anyone who has ever seen David Lean’s wonderful film of Oliver Twist, with its warrens and winding narrow streets through which urchins run like rats in the dark, has to know that no clear and simple Christian rhetoric can dispel that image of a confused and confusing world. There is a rhetoric of description, as critics from Charles Lamb, who talked about the ‘dumb rhetoric of the scenery’, to Robert Garis, who, describing Mrs Jellyby’s house in Bleak House, concluded that ‘every detail is a judgement’ understood.2 Even when we encounter what might appear to be simple, straightforward description of person or place, because of Dickens’s style of reportage, we can be fairly sure that it will begin to shade off immediately into something else: rhetorical admonition to social action or consciousness, or an invitation to escape into a world of fantasy.
Even in describing so palpable a thing as the slums of London, Dickens repeatedly insists upon the labyrinthine, maze-like confusion of the streets, courts and buildings, emphasising that quality of the district which makes its buildings seem indistinct as specific dwelling places and yet at the same time suggestive of dens and dungeons. The tottering and deserted hovels in which Fagin successively establishes his headquarters are all identical; they have no distinctive structure other than that, in almost surrealistic fashion, they are all single rooms reached by endless flights of stairs.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The Dynamics of Description
Steven Marcus, Dickens: from Pickwick to Dombey (London: Chatto & Windus, 1965) pp. 63–4.
Robert Garis, The Dickens Theatre (London: Oxford University Press, 1965) p. 109.
I. A. Richards, Principles of Literary Criticism (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1925) p. 240.
I. A. Richards, Practicial Criticism (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1929) p. 210.
William J. Harvey, Character and the Novel (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965) p. 37.
Donald Fanger, Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967) p. viii.
William Faulkner, Light in August (New York: Random House, 1950) p. 4.
Rudolf Arnheim, Visual Thinking (Berkeley: University of Chicago Press, 1971) p. 37.
George Orwell, ‘Charles Dickens’, in The Collected Essays, ed. Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968) p. 454.
Norman N. Holland, The Dynamics of Literary Response (London: Oxford University Press, 1968) p. 146.
Henri Bergson, ‘Laughter’, in Comedy, ed. Wylie Sypher (New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1956) p. 97.
Jonathan Culler, Structuralist Poetics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1975) p. 71.
Simon O. Lesser, Fiction and the Unconscious (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957) pp. 6–7.
Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1945) p. 373.
Bernard Schilling, in The Comic Spirit: Boccaccio to Thomas Mann (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1965) p. 108, recognises this fact too, when he says that Micawber ‘finds the cure and relief of suffering in its expression’.
Bruce F. Kawin, Telling it Again and Again: Repetition in Literature and Film (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1972) p. 4.
F. R. and Q. D. Leavis, Dickens the Novelist (New York: Random House, 1970) p. 311.
Leo Marx, The Machine in the Garden (New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1964).
See Mary McCarthy, ‘Recalled to Life, or Charles Dickens at the Bar’, in On the Contrary (New York: Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, 1946) for a discussion of the Victorian love of extremes, the ‘passion for mountain-climbing, for gorges and precipices, for the abysmal vertigo of crime and innocence, horror and bathos’.
Alexander Welsh, The City of Dickens (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971) p. 28.
Steven Marcus, ‘Human Nature, Social Orders, and 19th Century Systems of Explanation: Starting in with George Eliot’, in Salmagundi, No. 28 (Winter 1975) p. 22.
Pearl Chester Solomon, Dickens and Melville in their Time (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1975) p. 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1981 Susan R. Horton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Horton, S.R. (1981). The Dynamics of Description. In: The Reader in the Dickens World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05063-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05063-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-05065-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-05063-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)