Skip to main content

Epilogue: On Justifying Law and Order

  • Chapter
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

Locke is generally regarded as the first liberal exponent of a system of law and order in politics, though with sympathies for people’s revolutionary leanings. Herbert Marcuse may best be described as a radical exponent of modern demands for revolution and liberation from the Establishment, though acknowledging the necessity for an ultimate system of legal norms and ethical standards. The contrasting positions may be compared to advantage for the purpose of a present-day evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For Marcuse’s suggestion that toleration of speech and assembly should be withdrawn from ‘groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose …social security, medical care, etc.’, see ‘Repressive Tolerance’ in R.P. Wolff, B. Moore, and H. Marcuse, A Critique of Pure Tolerance, Boston, 1969, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For references see Melwin Richter, ‘Tocque ville ’s Contributions to the Theory of Revolution’, in Revolution (Nomos VIII), ed. C. J. Friedrich, New York, 1966, p. 88. See also Eugene Kamenka, ‘The Concept of a Political Revolution’, ibid., p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. D. Thoreau, On the Duty of Civil Disobedience (first pub. 1849) in Walden, ed. N. H. Pearson, N. Y. & Toronto, 1948 (reprint 1953, pp. 281–304); reprinted in H. A. Bedau (ed.), Civil Disobedience: Theory and Practice, N. Y., 1969; also in Signet Classic Paperback, N. Y., 1960. The book’s notoriety is mainly due to Gandhi’s use of it as the textbook for his passive resistance movement in India.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See his ‘Ethics and Revolution’, in Ethics and Society, ed. R. T. DeGeorge, NY, 1966 (reprinted in Revolution and the Rule of Law, ed. E. Kent, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971, pp. 46–59).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Robert C. Tucker, Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx, Cambridge, 1961, pp. 21–5 and 168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 W. von Leyden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Leyden, W. (1981). Epilogue: On Justifying Law and Order. In: Hobbes and Locke. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05060-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics