Bias in Perception of Agrarian Change in India

  • John Harriss
Part of the English Language Book Society student editions book series (ELBSSE)

Abstract

The sites of research and data referred to in articles and special studies in the Economic and Political Weekly or other key publications listed in Byres’ bibliographical paper (1972) and in subsequent issues of the EPW (to September 1974) are shown in Fig. 4.1. My analysis of the literature is thus restricted, and this obviously introduces the possibility of serious bias in the impression conveyed by the map. But the journal that has been my main source is a particularly influential one, so that the bias that it imparts is of special interest in itself. In addition, it has been the general experience of project members that the studies we know of have nearly all been carried out in the areas shown on this map. Farmer mentions ‘delta bias’ in studies of HYVs of paddy in explaining the reasons for his choice of North Arcot District as the locality for our research. My search of the literature suggests that this pattern is related to a more general bias towards IADP Districts, while the map also reveals the efforts of particularly energetic centres of research: the Punjab Agricultural University at Ludhiana; the Agro-Economic Research Centres (AERCs) at Sardar Patel University, Gujarat, at Waltair in Andhra Pradesh and at Delhi; and work by Ashok Rudra in West Bengal. Another source of bias, not shown on the map but familiar to those who have used the results of AERC Farm Management Surveys and Village Studies, is the practice of concentrating studies over time in particular villages and localities.

Keywords

Covariance Assure Defend Agro 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiyasami, U. (1974). A Review of Agro-Economic Research in Tamil Nadu with particular reference to Agrarian Change (unpublished).Google Scholar
  2. Béteille, A. (1974). Studies in Agrarian Social Structure, Delhi, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blaikie, P. M. (1972). ‘Implications of Selective Feedback in Aspects of Family Planning Research for Policy Makers in India’, Population Studies, 26, 437–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, D.D. (1971). Agricultural Development in India’s Districts, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byres, T. J. (1972). ‘The Dialectic of India’s Green Revolution’, S. Asian Rev., 5, 99–116.Google Scholar
  6. Dumont, L. (1964). ‘Change, Interaction and Comparison’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, 7.Google Scholar
  7. Dumont, L. (1966). Homo Hierarchicus, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
  8. Frankel, Francine (1971). India’s Green Revolution: Economic Gains and Political Costs, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Mencher, Joan P. (1974). Conflicts and Contradictions in the ‘Green Revolution’, Econ. Pol. Weekly, annual number, 309–23.Google Scholar
  10. Stokes, Eric (1973). ‘The First Century of British Colonial Rule in India: Social Revolution or Social Stagnation?’, Past and Present, 58, 136–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wharton, C. R. (1969). ‘The Green Revolution, Cornucopia or Pandora’s Box?’, Foreign Affairs, 47, 464— 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© B. H. Farmer 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Harriss

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations