Abstract
The approach that has usually been taken to the relationship between the Commonwealth and British foreign policy has consisted of an analysis of the Dominions as an ‘influence’ or pressure group, and an investigation to see whether any twist or turn of policy can be attributed to them. But this is much too specific a question to have value, for the Dominions did not possess any such precise or determinative functions. Thorne, struck by this in his study of the Manchuria affair, concluded
While the Dominions were kept informed of Britain’s general policy, they contributed almost nothing in the way of advice or even demands for discussion at government level. They existed as a defence, that was all.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
C. Thorne, The Limits of Foreign Policy (London, 1972) p. 141.
Ritchie Ovendale, Appeasement and the English-Speaking World, 1937–9 (Cardiff, 1975).
Riddell, Walter (1881–1963). Canadian Delegate to the League of Nations 1933–6.
Lord Avon, Memoirs: Facing the Dictators (London, 1962) p. 477.
De Valera to Neville Chamberlain, 15 September 1938. Quoted in K. Feiling, The Life of Neville Chamberlain (London, 1946) p. 364.
Copyright information
© 1981 R. F. Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holland, R.F. (1981). Commonwealth Cooperation and the International Crisis 1931–1939. In: Britain and the Commonwealth Alliance 1918–1939. Cambridge Commonwealth Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04926-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04926-4_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04928-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04926-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)