In Defence of Liberty

  • Terence H. Qualter

Abstract

As might be expected of a person of his background, Wallas became involved in a large number of ‘civil rights’ causes. His life was motivated by a deep passion for social equality. As Laski said of him, ‘He hated privilege with something of the fine indignation of his own hero, Bentham.’1 He was constantly defending minorities, supporting the oppressed, championing the victims of social injustice. His principal enemies were the established Church and its ‘dead hand of tradition’ which lay heavy on the advocates of progress, the newspaper barons who manipulated public opinion in their own interest, and all who opposed, or feared, the unbiased search after truth. In 1929 for example, he led, and was the principal spokesman for, a deputation to the Home Secretary on behalf of the Society for the Abolition of the Blasphemy Laws, urging the repeal of laws which still permitted prosecution for attacking the doctrines of the established Church.2 In 1916 he was one of the defenders of Bertrand Russell, protesting the British Government’s refusal to allow Russell a passport to visit the United States because of Russell’s opposition to the war. On this issue, in a letter to the Home Secretary, Herbert Samuel, Wallas wrote:

By refusing to allow a leading English philosopher to take up an American chair without pledging himself to say nothing in dispraise of British policy in the future — whatever that policy may be — the Government advertise the fact no American must take the statement of any Englishmen who is allowed to come as being sincere and unbiased. The Americans believe that they are being treated like children, and that something is being hidden from them.3

Keywords

Brittle Posit Allas Crest Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    H.J. Laski, ‘Lowes Dickinson and Graham Wallas’, Political Quarterly, 3(4) 1932, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 7.
    F. A. Hayek, Road to Serfdom (London: 1944).Google Scholar
  3. 12.
    T. H. Green, Lecture on ‘Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract’, 1881.Google Scholar
  4. 13.
    E. H. Carr, The New Society (1951) Beacon Press Edition, 109.Google Scholar
  5. 16.
    J. S. Mill, On Liberty, Everyman Edition (London: 1948) 73.Google Scholar
  6. 23.
    Jeremy Bentham, ‘Essay on the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen’ (1791).Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    H. R. G. Greaves, review of Wiener, Between Two Worlds, in Political Quarterly, 1972, 124.Google Scholar
  8. 26.
    E. S. Corwin, ‘The Democratic Dogma and the Future of Political Science’, American Political Science Review, 23(3) 1929, 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 28.
    A. D. Lindsay, review of The Great Society, in Political Quarterly, September 1914.Google Scholar
  10. 30.
    Alfred Zimmern, The Greek Commonwealth, first published in 1911.Google Scholar
  11. 32.
    Kenneth McNaught, ‘American Progressives and the Great Society’, Journal of American History, 53: 1966–7, 512.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Terence H. Qualter 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence H. Qualter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations