Abstract
In the previous chapter, we outlined the structure of the Miltonic world vision as it developed in the years of struggle and triumph. In this chapter we turn to the problematic of reason embattled, and to a direct analysis of the three longer poems. It should be emphasised, however, that the central structure of the rationalist world vision remained intact even in the face of the Restoration. In each of the three last poems, the notions of the discrete rational individual, and of freedom from both external constraint and passion, recur as central leitmotifs. The Restoration effects a transformation, not of the central categories themselves, but rather of their specific conjunctural organisation. In the earlier works, those categories had pointed remorselessly towards an essentially optimistic outcome: the Lady was rescued from Comus, the English people were twice successfully defended and, even at the bitter end, there yet remained a ready and easy way to save the Commonwealth.’ But that ready and easy way proved elusive. The coffers of the City of London were closed to the revolutionary government, and General Monck sold his second kingdom for filthy lucre.2 The defeated rationalists were thus faced with the problem of developing an adequate response to the triumph of un-reason over reason.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
T. S. Eliot, Milton: Two Studies, London, 1968, p. 38.
F. R. Leavis, Revaluation, Harmondsworth, 1972, p. 53.
F. R. Leavis, The Common Pursuit, London, 1952, 9–32.
D. Bush, Paradise Lost in Our Time, Gloucester, Mass., 1957, pp. 88–117;
C. S. Lewis, A Preface to Paradise Lost, Oxford, 1942, pp. 51–60.
B. Bergonzi, ‘Criticism and the Milton Controversy’, in F. Kermode (ed.), The Living Milton, London, 1960, p. 176.
T. S. Eliot, Selected Essays, London, 1963, pp. 281–91.
T. S. Eliot, ‘Donne In Our Time’, in T. Spencer (ed.), A Garland for John Donne, Cambridge, Mass., 1931, pp. 1–19.
E. M. W. Tillyard, The Miltonic Setting, London, 1938, pp. 141–68.
G. Lukács, The Theory of the Novel, London, 1971, p. 46.
For example, I. Samuel, Dante and Milton, New York, 1966
B. Willey, The Seventeenth Century Background, Harmondsworth, 1972, p. 212.
J. Milton, Poetical Works, Oxford, 1966, p. 518.
Cf. G. Lukács, The Historical Novel, Harmondsworth, 1969, pp. 106–107.
A. J. A. Waldock, Paradise Lost and Its Critics, Cambridge, 1961, p. 96.
E. M. W. Tillyard, Milton, Harmondsworth, 1968, p. 312.
Cf. J. H. Hanford, ‘Milton and the Return to Humanism’, Studies in Philology,vol. xvi, April 1919, pp. 126–47.
Cf. D. Saurat, Milton: Man and Thinker, London, 1924.
J. Peter, A Critique of Paradise Lost, London, 1960, pp. 61–2.
R. W. Condee, Structure in Milton’s Poetry, Pennsylvania, 1974, pp. 1–4 and pp. 175–9.
Quoted in W. Lamont and S. Oldfield, Politics, Religion and Literature in the Seventeenth Century, London, 1975, p. 235.
A. S. P. Woodhouse, ‘Tragic Effect in Samson Agonistes’, in A. E. Barker (ed.), Milton: Modern Essays in Criticism, New York, 1965, pp. 447–66.
Copyright information
© 1981 Andrew Milner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Milner, A. (1981). Reason Embattled. In: John Milton and the English Revolution. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04853-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04853-3_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04855-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04853-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)