Skip to main content
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we outlined the structure of the Miltonic world vision as it developed in the years of struggle and triumph. In this chapter we turn to the problematic of reason embattled, and to a direct analysis of the three longer poems. It should be emphasised, however, that the central structure of the rationalist world vision remained intact even in the face of the Restoration. In each of the three last poems, the notions of the discrete rational individual, and of freedom from both external constraint and passion, recur as central leitmotifs. The Restoration effects a transformation, not of the central categories themselves, but rather of their specific conjunctural organisation. In the earlier works, those categories had pointed remorselessly towards an essentially optimistic outcome: the Lady was rescued from Comus, the English people were twice successfully defended and, even at the bitter end, there yet remained a ready and easy way to save the Commonwealth.’ But that ready and easy way proved elusive. The coffers of the City of London were closed to the revolutionary government, and General Monck sold his second kingdom for filthy lucre.2 The defeated rationalists were thus faced with the problem of developing an adequate response to the triumph of un-reason over reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. T. S. Eliot, Milton: Two Studies, London, 1968, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. R. Leavis, Revaluation, Harmondsworth, 1972, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. R. Leavis, The Common Pursuit, London, 1952, 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bush, Paradise Lost in Our Time, Gloucester, Mass., 1957, pp. 88–117;

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. S. Lewis, A Preface to Paradise Lost, Oxford, 1942, pp. 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Bergonzi, ‘Criticism and the Milton Controversy’, in F. Kermode (ed.), The Living Milton, London, 1960, p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. S. Eliot, Selected Essays, London, 1963, pp. 281–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. S. Eliot, ‘Donne In Our Time’, in T. Spencer (ed.), A Garland for John Donne, Cambridge, Mass., 1931, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. M. W. Tillyard, The Miltonic Setting, London, 1938, pp. 141–68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Lukács, The Theory of the Novel, London, 1971, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For example, I. Samuel, Dante and Milton, New York, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Willey, The Seventeenth Century Background, Harmondsworth, 1972, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Milton, Poetical Works, Oxford, 1966, p. 518.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. G. Lukács, The Historical Novel, Harmondsworth, 1969, pp. 106–107.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. J. A. Waldock, Paradise Lost and Its Critics, Cambridge, 1961, p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. M. W. Tillyard, Milton, Harmondsworth, 1968, p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cf. J. H. Hanford, ‘Milton and the Return to Humanism’, Studies in Philology,vol. xvi, April 1919, pp. 126–47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. D. Saurat, Milton: Man and Thinker, London, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Peter, A Critique of Paradise Lost, London, 1960, pp. 61–2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. W. Condee, Structure in Milton’s Poetry, Pennsylvania, 1974, pp. 1–4 and pp. 175–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quoted in W. Lamont and S. Oldfield, Politics, Religion and Literature in the Seventeenth Century, London, 1975, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. S. P. Woodhouse, ‘Tragic Effect in Samson Agonistes’, in A. E. Barker (ed.), Milton: Modern Essays in Criticism, New York, 1965, pp. 447–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 Andrew Milner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milner, A. (1981). Reason Embattled. In: John Milton and the English Revolution. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04853-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics