Skip to main content

Nuclear Power

  • Chapter
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

It was concluded earlier, that of the various energy options available to modern civilization for the foreseeable future, only coal and nuclear fuels can provide adequately for the energy needs of the most countries, including the United States. However, the development of nuclear energy has been impeded by persistent controversies that have arisen out of a lack of confidence in the safety of nuclear-power generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hewlett, R. C. and O. E. Anderson. “The New World” (Volume I of a History of the Atomic Energy Commission), Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, University Park, Pa. (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Archer, V. E., J. D. Gillam and J. K. Wagoner. “Respiratory Disease Mortality among Uranium Miners,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 271: 280–293 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenbud, M. “Environmental Radioactivity,” 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lorenz, E. “Radioactivity and Lung Cancer: a Critical Review in Miners of Schneeberg and Joachimstahl,” J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 5:1 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, L. S. “Radiation Protection Standards,” Chem. Rubber Publ. Co., Cleveland, Ohio (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bush, S. H. “Reliability of Piping in Light Water Reactors,” Nuclear Safety 17:568–579 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Federal Register, 10 CFR 50, Appendix F, “Policy Relating to Siting of Commercial Fuel Reprocessing Plants and Related Waste Management Facilities” (November 14, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Electric Power Research Institute. “Plutonium: Facts and Inferences,” EPRI EA-43-SR, Special Report. Palo Alto, Cal. (1976), p. 6–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Marsily, G., E. Ledoux, A. Barbreau and J. Margat. “Nuclear Waste Disposal: Can the Geologist Guarantee Isolation?” Science 197: 519–527 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Medical Research Council (Great Britain). “The Toxicity of Plutonium,” Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gofman, J. W. “The Plutonium Controversy,” Journal of the American Medical Association 236: 284 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Willrich, M. and T. B. Taylor. “Nuclear Theft: Risks and Safeguards,” A Report to the Energy Policy Project of The Ford Foundation, Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass. (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. ERDA. “Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Program,” Public Hearing Record (held May 27–28, 1975 ) on the Proposed Final Environmental Statement WASH-1535, Washington, D.C. (June, 1975 ), Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. ERDA. “Light Water Breeder Reactor Program: Summary and Background,” ERDA 1541, Washington, D.C. (June, 1976 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lave, L. B. “Health Effects of Electricity Generation from Coal, Oil and Nuclear Fuel,” in: “Energy and the Environment” ( H. Ashley et al., eds.), Pergamon Press, New York (1976), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sagan, Leonard. “Public Health Aspects of Energy Systems,” in: “Energy and the Environment” ( H. Ashley et al., eds.), Pergamon Press, New York (1976), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sagan, L. A. “Human Costs of Nuclear Power,” Science 177: 487–493 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, J. E., E. D. Harward and D. T. Oakley. “Comparison of Radioactivity from Fossil Fuel and Nuclear Power Plants,” 91st U.S. Congress, 1st Session, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Hearings on Effects of Producing Electric Power, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1969), Vol. 1, pp. 773–809.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hull, A. P. “Radiation in Perspective: Some Comparisons of the Environmental Risks from Nuclear-and Fossil-fuel Power Plants,” Nuclear Safety 12(3):185–196 (May—June, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ellett, W. H. M. and A. C. B. Richardson. “Estimates of the Cancer Risk Due to Nuclear-Electric Power Generation,” Tech. Note ORP/CSD-76–2, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, D.C. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 New York University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eisenbud, M. (1978). Nuclear Power. In: Environment, Technology, and Health. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04752-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics