Advertisement

Reorganisation: 1960–7

  • Audrey Leathard

Abstract

Back in 1960 FPA headquarters faced mounting chaos. The organisation was inadequate to deal with the new demands and developments and was further impeded by the lack of any composite data regarding the autonomous branches, their staff, services, clients or finances. Pressed by Islington FPA and Mrs Clifford Smith, General Secretary at headquarters, the Association set up a working party, in 1959, to undertake a full-scale review of the FPA.

Keywords

Family Planning Family Planning Service Cervical Cytology Local Health Authority Marriage Cohort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Lafitte, Family Planning in the Sixties (London: Family Planning Association, 1963) inside cover.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., Chapter 3, p. 1, Chapter 4, p. 5; FPA, 31st Annual Report 1961/62, p. 8. The 212, 324 patients quoted did not include those of twenty-five clinics.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lafitte, Chapter 1, p. 1, Chapter 2, pp. 3–4, Chapter 3, p. 1; R. M. Pierce and G. Rowntree, ‘Birth Control in Britain Part II’, Population Studies, XV, 2 (1961) pp. 135, 153. (Survey background given earlier Chapter 9, ref. 38).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lafitte, Chapter 3, pp. 2–3. Of all new birth control clients, November 1960, only 0.19 per cent were men.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibid., Chapter 3, p. 8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., Chapter 6, p. 36; Chapter 5, pp. 20–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid., Chapter 1, pp. 6–10; Chapter 8, pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ‘Family Planning’, The Times, 25 October 1963; Eugenics Review, LV, 4 (1964) pp. 192–4.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Mitchell, ‘A.G.M. and Conference 1964’, Family Planning, 13, 2 (1964) P. 39.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. P. Blacker, ‘Family Planning in the Sixties’, Family Planning, 13, 1 (1964) p. 27.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The member was Sir Allen Daley.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Professor Lafitte, personal interview, 24 November 1972.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dr H. Wright, ‘Fifty Years of Family Planning’, Family Planning, 21, 4 (1973) p. 90; Dr D. Pyke, personal interview, 4 September 1973.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mrs F. Parker, FPA Director of Education, personal interview, 20 November 1974.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    FPA, 35th Annual Report and Accounts 1965/66, p. 4; 37th Annual Report and Accounts 1967/68, p. 5.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. Suitters, Be Brave and Angry (London: IPPF, 1973) pp. 96, 105, 193–4; FPA, 30th Annual Report 1960/61, p. 14.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ‘Family Planning International Campaign’, Family Planning, 12, 2 (1963) p. 49; 13, 2 (1964) p. 33; 15, 3 (1966) p. 86.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suitters, pp. 290, 392.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Peel and M. Potts, Textbook of Contraceptive Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969) pp. 128–48.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    FPA, 39th Annual Report and Accounts 1970/71, p. 10.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ministry of Health, On the State of the Public Health: Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 1961, Cmnd 1856 (London: HMSO, 1962) pp. 204–7.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sir T. Fox, ‘Cervical Cytology Service’, FPA archives (22 February 1966).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    FPA, 31st Annual Report 1961/62, p. 14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    FPA, 33rd Annual Report 1963/64, pp. 9, 15.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hansard (Lords), 246 (17 February 1963) cols. 699–702; 269 (2 November 1965) cols. 737–66.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    BMJ, 2 (1964) p. 1410.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Kaye, ‘Cancer Prevention at the House’, Family Planning, 14, 1 (1965) p. 18.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    FPA, NEC Minutes, 23 July 1964.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hansard (Commons), 685 (2 December 1963) col. 125; 686 (9 December 1963) cols. 5–6.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ministry of Health, ‘Population Screening for Cancer of the Cervix’, E.C.L$197/66, H.M. (66) 76 (London, 21 October 1966).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    BMJ, 2 (1966) p. 1083.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    DHSS, On the State of the Public Health: Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 1969 (London: HMSO, 1970) p. 81.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ibid., p. 82.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    ‘Domiciliary Services in York’, Family Planning, 16, 3 (1967) pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. Peel and F. Schenk, ‘Domiciliary Birth Control’, Eugenics Review, 57, 2 (1965) pp. 67–9.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ministry of Health, ‘Family Planning’, Circular 5/66 (London, 17 February 1966).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. Mitchell, ‘Domiciliary Visiting in London’, Family Planning, 15, 4 (1967) pp. 107–9.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    B. Abel-Smith and P. Townsend, The Poor and the Poorest (London: Bell, 1965); FPA, 35th Annual Report and Accounts 1965/66, p. 7; 36th Annual Report 1966/67, p. 6.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Family Planning, 15, 1 (1966) pp. 9–11;15, 4 (1967) pp. 111–12; 16, 1(1967) p. 29.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mitchell, Family Planning (1967) p. 109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Audrey Leathard 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Audrey Leathard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations