Abstract
The year 1921 represented a turning point for the birth control movement. In London on 17 March Marie Stopes opened the first birth control clinic in the British Empire. By 19 November the Malthusian League had established a centre for contraceptive instruction. In Birmingham on 12 October, Lord Dawson, the King’s physician, outspokenly supported birth control in an address to the lay Church Congress. A groundswell of forces led up to these three events which caused a public sensation. Crucial to understanding their impact is an appreciation of the prevailing hostility towards contraception.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Stocks, ‘The Story of Family Planning’, in C. H. Rolph (ed.), The Human Sum (London: Heinemann, 1957) pp. 49–51.
J. A. and O. Banks, Feminism and Family Planning in Victorian England (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1964) pp. 117–18.
F. Campbell, ‘Birth Control and the Christian Churches’, Population Studies, 14 (1960) p. 131.
The Lambeth Conferences (1867–1948) (London: S.P.C.K., 1948) p. 295.
J. Peel, ‘Contraception and the Medical Profession’, Population Studies, 18 (1964) pp. 133, 136.
Lancet, 1 (1921) p. 677.
Lancet, 2 (1917) p. 207.
C. K. Millard, Population and Birth Control (Leicester: Thornley, 1917) p. 6.
National Birth-Rate Commission, The Declining Birth-Rate, 2nd edn. (London: Chapman & Hall, 1917) pp. 87–188.
BMJ, 2 (1912) p. 158.
Millard, pp. 44–5.
Sir J. Marchant (ed.), The Control of Parenthood (London: Putnam’s, 1920) Introduction and pp. 53–67.
National Birth-Rate Commission, The Declining Birth-Rate; Problems of Population and Parenthood (London: Chapman & Hall, 1920). The Commission was instituted by the National Council of Public Morals formed in 1913 for the promotion of race regeneration - spiritual, moral and physical.
P. Fryer, The Birth Controllers (London: Corgi, 1967) pp. 178–91.
Report of the Royal Commission on Population, Cmd 7695 (London: HMSO, 1949) pp. 26, 218–20.
J. A. Banks, Prosperity and Parenthood (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1954) pp. 86–102.
Fryer, pp. 110–18, 178–210.
E. Lewis-Faning, Report on an Enquiry into Family Limitation and its Influence on Human Fertility during the past Fifty Years, Papers of the Royal Commission on Population, 1 (London: HMSO, 1949) pp. 7–10.
J. Peel, ‘The Manufacture and Retailing of Contraceptives in England’, Population Studies, 17 (1963) p. 120.
Ibid. pp. 116, 120.
E. Elderton, Report on the English Birthrate: Part I England, North of the Humber (London: Dulau, 1914).
A. Jacobs, ‘Birth Control’, in N. Haire (ed.), Some More Medical Views on Birth Control (London: Palmer, 1928) p. 175.
Lancet, 2 (1917) p. 207.
The Malthusian, 1 (February 1879) p. 8.
The Malthusian, XXX, 1 (1906) pp. 3–4; XXX, 3 (1906) pp. 18–19. The Malthusian was sub-titled ‘A Crusade against Poverty’.
The Malthusian, XLIV, 10 (1920) p. 74; XLIV, 11 (1920) p. 85.
The Malthusian, XLV, 5 (1921) p. 34.
H. Ellis, ‘Birth-Control and Eugenics’, Eugenics Review, IX, 1 (1917) pp. 32–41.
Banks, Feminism and Family Planning in Victorian England, pp. 120–1.
S. Rowbotham and J. Weeks, Socialism and the New Life (London: Pluto, 1977) pp. 117–18.
M. Stocks, My Commonplace Book (London: Peter Davies, 1970) p. 76.
L. Jeger, ‘The Politics of Family Planning’, Political Quarterly, 33, 1 (1962) p. 50.
Copyright information
© 1980 Audrey Leathard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leathard, A. (1980). The Forces of Change. In: The Fight for Family Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04451-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04451-1_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04453-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04451-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)