Skip to main content

The Spark that became a Flame: the Bolsheviks, Propaganda and the Cinema

  • Chapter
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

Long before 1917 the distinction between agitation and propaganda had become a commonplace of Russian socialist theory and practice. Indeed, these concepts had their origins in an earlier generation that preceded the emergence of Russian Marxism, with men such as Herzen, Bakunin, Chernyshevsky and Lavrov, and more particularly with the publication of journals such as Herzen’s Kolokol (The Bell) or Lavrov’s Vperyod (Forward). The immense significance of these activities for the revolutionary movement as a whole reflected both its complete exclusion from political power and the absence in Russia of the open political debate through which that power might have been modified or even gradually acquired. Having nowhere else to go, the revolutionaries went underground, and an underground movement, even more than a conventional political party, needs a forum for its theoretical debates and a focal point for its political activities. These were two of the functions performed by the underground press during these years, but the third function, which in the longer term was perhaps to prove the most important, was to attract first the support and later the active participation of ever broader circles of the population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. V. Plekhanov, O zadachakh sotsialistov v bor’be s golodom v Rossii (Pis’ma k molodym tovarishcham) (Geneva, 1892 ) pp. 57–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A translation of part of this work appears in N. Harding and R. Taylor (eds), Marxism in Russia: Key Documents ( London, 1980 ). I am profoundly indebted to Neil Harding for his assistance and advice in the preparation of this chapter. Except where otherwise stated, translations are my own, but I give a source for published translations where known to me.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Kremer and Yu. Martov, Ob agitatsii (Geneva, 1886 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See the accounts of the reception and significance of this brochure in A. K. Wildman, The Making of a Workers’ Revolution (Chicago, 1967) pp. 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  5. and N. Harding, Lenin’s Political Thought, vol. 1 (London, 1977) pp. 110–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, 45 vols (Moscow, 1960–70) vol. V, pp. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. K. Krupskaya, O Lenine. Sbornik statei i vystuplenii (Moscow, 1971 ) p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. Lunacharsky, Stat’i o literature (Moscow, 1957 ) p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in C. V. James, Soviet Socialist Realism: Origins and Theory (London, 1973 ) p. 22.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. I take the arguments of Boris Thomson, encapsulated in his sentence, ‘Art is nothing if it is not human; this is both its strength and its weakness’, in his Lot’s Wife and the Venus of Milo: Conflicting Attitudes to the Cultural Heritage in Modern Russia (Cambridge, 1978) pp. 139–54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also the points made by Ben Brewster in ‘The Soviet State, the Communist Party and the Arts, 1917–1936’, Red Letters, no. 3 (Autumn 1976) 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. It is unfortunate that Lenin’s most important pronouncements on the arts come to us through hearsay. N. I. Krutikova (ed.), Lenin o kul’ture i iskusstve (Moscow, 1956 ) pp. 519–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. Annenkov, Dnevnik moikh vstrech. Tsikl tragedii, 2 vols (New York, 1966 ) vol. 11, p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Fitzpatrick, The Commissariat of Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1970) pp. 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. V. Mayakovsky, Izbrannye proizvedeniya, 2 vols (Leningrad, 1963 ) vol. 1, p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A similar tendency limited the effectiveness of the agitational paintings on the sides of the agit-trains. See Dziga Vertov’s ‘Kinoglaz’, first published in 1926 and reprinted in S. Drobashenko (ed.), Dziga Vertov. Stat’i, dnevniki, zamysli (Moscow, 1966) pp. 90–1. There were similar difficulties with attempts to replace old statues and create a revolutionary style of ‘monumental propaganda’ (Krutikova, Lenin o kul’ture, pp. 525–6).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cf. R. Taylor, ‘A Medium for the Masses: Agitation in the Soviet Civil War’, Soviet Studies, XXII, no. 4 (1971) 562–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Sokolov, ‘Skrizhal’ veka’, Kino-Fot, 25–31 Aug 1922, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hence Lenin’s emphasis on the need to pay special attention to the use of the cinema in these areas: see his directive of 17 Jan 1922, in A. M. Gak (ed.), Samoe vazhnoe iz vsekh iskusstv. Lenin o kino, 2nd edn (Moscow, 1973) p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Shipulinsky, ‘Dusha kino’, in Kinematograf. Sbornik statei (Moscow, 1919 ) p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. M. Gak and N. A. Glagoleva (eds), Lunacharskii o kino (Moscow, 1965 ) p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. Lenin’s reaction to the Hungarian revolutionaries’ immediate nationalisation of theatres and cabarets. A. Yufit (ed.), Lenin. Revolyutsiya. Teatr. Dokumenty i vospominaniya (Leningrad, 1970) p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 510. See also E. Drabkina, ‘Arkhivazhneishee delo’, Iskusstvo kino, Jan 1965, pp. 25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. V. Lunacharsky, Kino na zapade i u nas (Moscow, 1928 ) p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Taylor, ‘From October to October: The Soviet Political System in the 1920s and Its Films’, in M.J. Clark (ed.), Politics and the Media (Oxford, 1979 ) p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Taylor, The Politics of the Soviet Cinema, 1917–1929 (Cambridge, 1979), pp. 64–101.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cf. T. Rokotov, ‘Pochemu malodostupen Oktyabr’?’, Zhizn’ iIkusstva, 10 Apr 1928, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The report of the conference was published as B.S. Ol’khovyi (ed.), Puti kino. Pervoe Vsesoyuznoe partiinoe soveshchanie po kinematografii (Moscow, 1929). The following extracts are from pp. 34, 222, 214 and 430–1 respectively. See also Taylor, The Politics of the Soviet Cinema, pp. 102–23.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. A. Lebedev (ed.), Partiya o kino (Moscow, 1939 ) pp. 82–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. ‘Perspektivy’ (1929), reprinted in S. M. Eizenstein, Izbrannye proizvedeniya, 6 vols (Moscow, 1964–71) vol. II, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  31. This information comes from A. Rubailo, ‘Obzor moskovskikh i leningradskikh arkhivnykh fondov o deyatel’nosti Kommunisticheskoi partii v oblasti kino (1928–1936)’, Iz istorii kino, no. 10 (1977) 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cf. M. Ferro, ‘The Fiction Film and Historical Analysis’, in P. Smith (ed.), The Historian and Film (Cambridge, 1976) pp. 80–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. and S. Crofts, ‘Ideology and Form: Soviet Socialist Realism and Chapayev’, Essays in Poetics, vol. 11 (1977) pp. 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ‘The Idea of Art’, in V. Belinsky, Selected Philosophical Works (Moscow, 1948) pp. 168, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. D. Trotsky, Literature and Revolution (New York, 1957 ) p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1980 Richard Taylor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, R. (1980). The Spark that became a Flame: the Bolsheviks, Propaganda and the Cinema. In: Rigby, T.H., Brown, A., Reddaway, P. (eds) Authority, Power and Policy in the USSR. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04326-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics