Abstract
In 1916 Bukharin produced a masterly article, ‘Towards a Theory of the Imperialist State’.1 In it he came to the conclusion that the modern bourgeois state had grown into a monstrous oppressive power, militarist in ethos, absolute in its pretensions, swallowing up all the vital forces of society and destroying all group and individual autonomy. In his nightmare vision the ‘mailed fist’, the ‘iron heel’ of the modern imperialist state impressed its ruthless stamp upon a cowed and servile society. The pattern of domination and subservience which the Marxist idea of the state encapsulated, had been brought to its perfected expression. The imperative for Marxists to concentrate all their attention on the destruction of this new Leviathan was, he believed, inescapable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
N. I. Bukharin, ‘K teorii imperialisticheskogo gosudarstva’, in Revoliutsia prava, Sbornik pervyi, no. 25 (Moscow, 1925; referred to hereafter as ‘K teorii’).
This article was written in 1916, and various parts and abstracts of it were published in that year — for details see S. Heitman, Nikolai I. Bukharin: A Bibliography (Stanford, Calif., 1969) pp. 29–30 — but it was not published in full until 1925. Not available in translation.
N. Bukharin, Ekonomika perekhodnogo periods, chast’ i. obschchaya teoriya transformatsionnogo protsessa (Moscow, 1920). An anonymous English translation, with Lenin’s critical remarks, has been published under the somewhat misleading title Economics of the Transformation Period (New York, 1971). For the convenience of those who do not read Russian, I will cross-reference on the following model: Ekonomika, p. 7 (Economics, p. 11). The translation of this text by Oliver Field, with Introduction by K.J. Tarbuck (London, 1979), came to my notice only after completion of these notes.
‘K teorii’, p. 8. See F. Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, (Chicago, 1902 ) p. 206.
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The Manifesto of the Communist Party; in Collected Works, 50 vols (London, 1975–) vol. VI, p. 499: ‘Capital is, therefore, not a personal, it is a social power.’
N. Bukharin, Mirovoe khozyaistvo i imperializm, with an Introduction by Lenin (Moscow, 1917). References in the text are to the English translation, Imperialism and World Economy (London, n.d. [1929 or 1930]).
R. Hilferding, Das Finanzkapital, in M. Adler (ed.), Marx-Studien, Drifter Band (Vienna, 1910). References in the text are to the Russian edition, Finansovyi kapital (Moscow, 1914 ).
V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, 45 vols (Moscow, 1960–70) vol. XXXV, p. 231.
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works, 2 vols (London, 1942) vol. II, pp. 315–426. I have resorted to the Selected Works for those texts not yet covered by the Collected Works (see note 4).
A useful, if somewhat exhaustive, account of the manner in which these agencies of working-class self-administration were rapidly usurped by the party-state apparatus is given in Charles Bettelheim’s Class Struggles in the USSR, vol. I: 1917–1923 ( Hassocks, Sussex, 1977 ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1980 Neil Harding
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harding, N. (1980). Authority, Power and the State, 1916–20. In: Rigby, T.H., Brown, A., Reddaway, P. (eds) Authority, Power and Policy in the USSR. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04326-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04326-2_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04328-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04326-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)