Strategy for an Atomic Monopoly
Americans were accustomed to viewing international politics, which up to 1940 was to all intents and purposes European politics, with a certain detachment. The European propensity to war was symptomatic of its dominance by reactionary and decadent élites and the persistence of imperialist instincts. Furthermore, there was little reason to view war as a grim struggle for survival, let alone a time for defiant resistance. The United States’ industrial and economic resources were so vast that there were few doubts that, once she put her mind to the task, any enemy would be eventually overwhelmed. The United States was the weary policeman, slow to be roused and loath to get involved in the internecine quarrels of European states. Once aware of danger and into action, she was unbeatable.
KeywordsClay Europe Petroleum Assure Expense
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Walter Lippmann, ‘Why we are disarming ourselves?’, Redbrook Magazine (September 1946), p. 106.Google Scholar
- 2.Bernard Brodie, ‘The atom bomb as policy-make’, Foreign Affairs, XXVII: 1 (October 1948), p. 21.Google Scholar
- 3.William Fox, The Superpowers: The United States, Britain and the Soviet Union and Their Responsibility for Peace (New York: Harcourt & Brace, 1944), p. 102.Google Scholar
- 9.Walter Millis (ed.), The Forrestal Diaries (London: Cassell & Co. 1952), p. 45.Google Scholar
- 14.Air Staff, Strategic Implications of the Atomic Bomb on Warfare (3 February 1947). See Klotz, op. cit.Google Scholar
- 15.Joint Chiefs of Staff, Evaluation of Current Strategic Air Offensive Plans (21 December 1948), in Etzold and Gaddis, op. cit. pp.357–60.Google Scholar
- 17.H. S. Dinerstein, War and the Soviet Union (New York: Praeger, 1959), p. 32.Google Scholar
- 18.In 1949, cited in Raymond L. Garthoff, Soviet Military Doctrine (Illinois: The Free Press, 1953), p. 174.Google Scholar
- 19.Colonel-General of Aviation Nikitin, cited in Raymond L. Garthoff, Soviet Strategy in the Nuclear Age (New York: Praeger, 1958), pp. 173–4.Google Scholar