Abstract
As controversial as McNamara’s desire to improve the Alliance’s conventional option was his desire to dissuade the Europeans from developing their own nuclear options. The distaste for the independent nuclear deterrents was not solely a question of saving resources for conventional weapons. It was also related to concepts of controlled nuclear warfare, in which, even after the nuclear fire-break had been breached, an attempt would still be made to prevent matters getting out of hand. Reflecting the scientific bent of the time, and indicating the indeterminate possibilities for proliferation, the issue was then described as ‘The Nth Country Problem’, a term that has now happily passed out of fashion.1 By giving anonymity to the offending country, the term suggested that the problems were similar whoever the Nth power might be. One of the frequent observations on this matter was that whereas the Nth power viewed his own acquisition of nuclear weapons as being fully justified, he would probably see any N + 1th power as a threat to world peace.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example, National Planning Association, The ‘Nth Country’ Problem and Arms Control (New York: NPA, 1959).
A corrective to some of the pessimism on the subject is found in Fred Iklé, ‘Nth countries and disarmament’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, XVI: 10 (December 1960).
Albert Wohlstetter, ‘Nuclear sharing: NATO and the N + 1 country’, Foreign Affairs, xxxix:3 (April 1961).
John Garnett, ‘British strategic thought’, in John Baylis (ed.), British Defence Policy in a Changing World (London: Croom Helm, 1977), p. 163.
Hedley Bull, ‘International theory: the case for a classical approach’, World Politics (April 1966).
Stephen King-Hall, Power Politics in the Nuclear Age: A Policy for Britain (London: Gollancz Ltd, 1962), p. 171 (emphasis in original).
John Strachey, On the Prevention of War (London: Macmillan, 1962).
The problems of miscommunication in this affair are examined in Richard Neustadt, Alliance Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970).
Lawrence Freedman, Britain and Nuclear Weapons (London: Macmillan, 1980).
Copyright information
© 1983 The International Institute for Strategic Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freedman, L. (1983). The European Nuclear Option (i) Anglo-Saxon Views. In: The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_20
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04273-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04271-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)