Skip to main content

The European Nuclear Option (i) Anglo-Saxon Views

  • Chapter
The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

As controversial as McNamara’s desire to improve the Alliance’s conventional option was his desire to dissuade the Europeans from developing their own nuclear options. The distaste for the independent nuclear deterrents was not solely a question of saving resources for conventional weapons. It was also related to concepts of controlled nuclear warfare, in which, even after the nuclear fire-break had been breached, an attempt would still be made to prevent matters getting out of hand. Reflecting the scientific bent of the time, and indicating the indeterminate possibilities for proliferation, the issue was then described as ‘The Nth Country Problem’, a term that has now happily passed out of fashion.1 By giving anonymity to the offending country, the term suggested that the problems were similar whoever the Nth power might be. One of the frequent observations on this matter was that whereas the Nth power viewed his own acquisition of nuclear weapons as being fully justified, he would probably see any N + 1th power as a threat to world peace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, National Planning Association, The ‘Nth Country’ Problem and Arms Control (New York: NPA, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A corrective to some of the pessimism on the subject is found in Fred Iklé, ‘Nth countries and disarmament’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, XVI: 10 (December 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albert Wohlstetter, ‘Nuclear sharing: NATO and the N + 1 country’, Foreign Affairs, xxxix:3 (April 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Garnett, ‘British strategic thought’, in John Baylis (ed.), British Defence Policy in a Changing World (London: Croom Helm, 1977), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hedley Bull, ‘International theory: the case for a classical approach’, World Politics (April 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stephen King-Hall, Power Politics in the Nuclear Age: A Policy for Britain (London: Gollancz Ltd, 1962), p. 171 (emphasis in original).

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Strachey, On the Prevention of War (London: Macmillan, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The problems of miscommunication in this affair are examined in Richard Neustadt, Alliance Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence Freedman, Britain and Nuclear Weapons (London: Macmillan, 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 The International Institute for Strategic Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freedman, L. (1983). The European Nuclear Option (i) Anglo-Saxon Views. In: The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics