Abstract
The prescriptive implications of the sort of abstract theorizing discussed in the last chapter were perplexing to many. In one sense they were quite radical in that they suggested a totally new approach to strategy and dealings with a potential enemy. In another sense they were extremely conservative because they took the status quo as a given, and devoted their energies to its preservation. Little hope was offered that the East-West conflict might be resolved either by political or military means. Their analyses yielded neither new ideas on how to achieve a political accommodation with the Soviet Union nor military concepts that opened up the prospect of victory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
C. W. Sherwin, ‘Securing peace through military technology’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (May 1956).
A short piece by Amster entitled ‘Design for deterrence’, was appended. The original Amster study appeared as A Theory for the Design of a Deterrent Air Weapon System (San Diego, Calif.: Convair Corporation, 1955).
For evidence of the influence of Amster/Sherwin see Schelling, Strategy of Conflict, p. 7 and Arthur Lee Burns, ‘Disarmament or the balance of terror’, World Politics, XII: 1 (October 1959), p. 134.
Thomas Schelling and Morton Halperin, Strategy and Arms Control (New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1961), pp. 1–2.
Bernard Bechhoefer, Postwar Negotiations for Arms Control (Washington DC: Brookings Institution 1961).
Alva Myrdal, The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1977), p. XIV.
Robert Osgood, ‘Stabilizing the military environment’, American Political Science Review, LV:1 (March 1961).
Malcolm Hoag, ‘On Stability in Deterrent Races’, World Politics, XIII: 4 (July 1961), p. 522.
The term is taken from Thomas Murray, Nuclear Policy for War and Peace, (Ohio: World Publishing Co., 1960), p. 28. Murray, a catholic member of the Atomic Energy Commission, attempted more than most others connected with the nuclear programme to inject a moral element into the debate. A discussion of a variety of ethical problems is found in Green, Deadly Logic chap. 6. Green also provides a useful bibliography.
Green’s ideas are discussed, unsympathetically, in Morton A. Kaplan (ed.), Strategic Thinking and Its Moral Implications (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973).
See also Sydney Bailey, Prohibitions and Restraints in Warfare (London, Oxford University Press, 1972).
Lieutenant-General Sir John Cowley, ‘Future trends in warfare’, Journal of the Royal United Services Institute (February 1960), p. 13.
Kenneth E. Boulding, Conflict and Defense: A General Theory (New York: Harper & Row, 1963).
Aaron Wildaysky, ‘Practical consequences of the theoretical study of defence policy’, Public Administration Review, XXV (March 1965). Reprinted in The Revolt Against the Masses (New York, Basic Books, 1971).
Robert Jervis, ‘Hypotheses on misperception’, World Politics xx (April 1968), p. 455.
On the British campaign see Christopher Driver, The Disarmers (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1964).
Philip Noel-Baker, The Arms Race (London: John Calder, 1958).
Leo Szilard, ‘Disarmament and the Problem of Peace’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, XI: 8 (October 1955), p. 298.
Leo Szilard, ‘How to Live with the Bomb and Survive’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, XVI: 2 (February 1960), p. 59.
Copyright information
© 1983 The International Institute for Strategic Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freedman, L. (1983). Arms Control. In: The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04271-5_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04273-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04271-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)