Skip to main content

Efficiency Curves in the Theory of Capital: A Synthesis

  • Chapter
The Measurement of Capital

Abstract

In Capital and Time Hicks (1973) introduced the ‘efficiency curve’ to capital theory. This was not new, except in name, for many authors had written previously of ‘factor price frontiers’ (Samuelson (1962)), ‘optimal transformation frontiers’ (Bruno (1969)), ‘wage frontiers’ (an earlier vintage of Hicks (1965)) and ‘w-r relationships’ (Harcourt (1972)). None of these earlier names captured the important dual nature of these curves, which relate not only the real wage to the profit rate, but also the level of consumption output per labour unit to the growth rate. This duality has been demonstrated by Hicks (1973), by Bruno (1969) and in its most general form by Burmeister and Kuga (1970), but none of these authors has exploited the expository powers of efficiency curves to the full. In this paper we shall discuss the role of these curves in many parts of steady state capital theory, including the debates on the measurement of capital and on Marxian theorems. Their usefulness is heightened by the fact that, even in the most complicated models involving joint production, an efficiency curve can be represented in two dimensions without the problems of aggregation which prevent the use of plane geometry so often in multisectoral models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bliss, C. J. (1975) Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, M. (1969), ‘Fundamental Duality Relations in the Pure Theory of Capital and Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkill, J. C. (1962), A First Course in Mathematical Analysis (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E. (1974), ‘Synthesising the NeoAustrian and Alternative Approaches to Capital Theory: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E., and Kuga, K. (1970), ‘The Factor Price Frontier, Duality and Joint Production’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, J. A. G. (1975), ‘Capital Theory and the Process of Production’, Economica, vol. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, J. A. G. (1977) ‘On the Marginal Product of Capital’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R., Samuelson, P. A., Solow, R. M. (1958), Linear Programming and Economic Analysis (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. (1960), The Theory of Linear Economic Models (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. C. (1972), Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. and Simon, H. A. (1949), ‘Note: Some Conditions of Macroeconomic Stability’, Econometrica, vol. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1965), Capital and Growth (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1973), Capital and Time (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1968), Mathematical Economics (London: Macmillan). Marx, K., Capital, first published 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrles, J. A. (1969), ‘The Dynamic Nonsubstitution Theorem’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M. (1973), Marx’s Economics (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M. (1975), ‘Marx in the Light of Modern Economic Theory’, Econometrica, vol. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M. (1976), ‘Positive Profits with Negative Surplus Value: A Comment’, Economica Journal, vol. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuti, D. M. (1970), ‘Capitalism, Socialism and Steady Growth’, Economic Journal, vol. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1962), ‘Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: the Surrogate Production Function’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. and von Weisacker, C. C. (1971), ‘A New Labor Theory of Value, for Rational Planning Through the Use of the Bourgeoise Profit Rate’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, I. (1975), ‘Positive Profits with Negative Surplus Value’, Eco-nomic Journal, vol. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, I. (1976), ‘Positive Profits with Negative Surplus Value: A Reply’, Economic Journal, vol. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1970), ‘Nonsubstitution Theorems with Durable Capital Goods’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter, E. (1973), ‘Surplus Labour, Synchronised Labour Costs and Marx’s Labour Theory of Value’, Economic Journal, vol. 83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 John Craven

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Craven, J. (1979). Efficiency Curves in the Theory of Capital: A Synthesis. In: Patterson, K.D., Schott, K. (eds) The Measurement of Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04127-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics