Skip to main content
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

A comparison of the twelve developed countries covered in this survey reveals that they may be divided into two main categories: those which have a constitutional or other law providing for a public right to administrative information, and those which do not. Seven countries are in the first category, while only five are in the second. Countries of the first type are the four in Scandinavia, the United States and the two East European countries. Those without such a right are the four other countries in Western Europe, and Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Human Rights, Proceedings of the Colloquy of the Council of Europe on Freedom of Information and the Duty for Public Authorities to Make Available Information ( Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. John McMillan, ‘Freedom of Information in Australia: Issue Closed’ Federal Law Review 8 (1977), 379–434.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 International Institute of Administrative Sciences

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowat, D.C. (1979). Comparative Survey. In: Rowat, D.C. (eds) Administrative Secrecy in Developed Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04124-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics