Assisting the Public: Advice and Negotiation with Businesses

  • Ross Cranston
Part of the Oxford Socio-Legal Studies book series (OSLS)

Abstract

Traditionally, consumers have been treated as responsible for taking the initiative to enforce their rights under the civil law. The state was not directly involved, except in major cases where it may have provided the services of a lawyer through legal aid. Consumer advice services have now been established within consumer agencies and actually intervene in disputes on behalf of consumers where it appears that there has been a breach of the civil law. Representations are made to businesses on behalf of aggrieved consumers, in the hope that redress will be forthcoming without the need to take court action.

Keywords

Assure Shoe Mete 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    R. Parnas, ‘Police Discretion and Diversion of Incidents of Intra-Family Violence’ Law and Contemporary Problems, 36 (1970), 539, 545.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saad Z. Nagi, ‘Gate-Keeping Decisions in Service Organizations When Validity Fails’, Human Organization 33 (1974), 47, 54.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harold Wilensky and C. Lebeaux, Industrial Society and Social Welfare (New York: Russell Sage, 1958) pp. 298–303.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Don H. Zimmerman, ‘Fact as Practical Accomplishment’, in Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974) p. 129.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cf. T. L. Eovaldi and J. E. Gestrin, ‘Justice for Consumers: The Mechanics of Redress’, Northeastern University Law Review, 26 (1971), 281, 300.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cf. Peter M. Blau, The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963) p. 170.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Note, ‘The Role of the Michigan Attorney-General in Consumer and Environmental Protection’, Michigan Law Review, 72 (1974), 1030, 1056; Laura Nader, ‘Styles of Court Procedure: To Make The Balance’, in Laura Nader (ed.), Law in Culture and Society (Chicago: Aldine, 1969) pp. 85–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cf. Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, 2nd. ed., (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1955) p. 21.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cf. H. Laurence Ross, Settled out of Court (Chicago: Aldine, 1970) p. 158.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cf. Vilhelm Aubert, ‘Competition and Dissensus: Two Types of Conflict and of Conflict Resolution’, Journal of Conflict Resolutions, 7 (1963), 26, 35–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cf. Torstein Eckhoff, ‘The Mediator, the Judge and the Administrator in Conflict-Resolution’ Acta Sociologica 10 (1967) 148, 159; P. H. Gulliver, ‘Case Studies of Law in Non-Western Societies’, in Laura Nader, op. cit. p. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hilary Rose, ‘Who Can De-Label the Claimant?’, Social Work Today, 4 (1973), 409, 412.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irving Gofman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971) p. 148.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Parnas, ‘The Police Response to the Domestic Disturbance’ Wisconsin Law Review [1967], 914, 923.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ross Cranston 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ross Cranston

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations