Abstract
It has long been a source of concern to students of marketing research that some of the more sophisticated marketing research techniques, such as multidimensional scaling, routinely used in the generation of ideas for new consumer products, have not been extensively applied to the generation of ideas for new industrial products. Under the well-founded assumption that there is at least latent demand for improved need search and idea generation methodologies in the industrial sector,2 research is being conducted by many to explore differences in the consumer and industrial buying situations, differences that might be preventing straightforward transfer of consumer marketing research tools to that sector.
The research reported on in this paper was supported by the National Science Foundation, Division of Policy Research and Analysis, under Grant # DA — 44366.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. Rothwell, C. Freeman et al., ‘Sappho Updated — Project Sappho Phase II’, Research Policy 3 (1974).
Robinson, Farris and Wind, Industrial Buying and Creative Marketing, ( Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1967 ).
G. Brand, The Industrial Buying Decision ( New York: Wiley, 1972 ).
J.-M. Chofl’ray and G. Lilien, ‘Models of the Multiperson Choice Process with Application to the Adoption of Industrial Products’. Sloan School of Management Working Paper # 861–76, June 1976.
L.-G. Mattsson, ‘Systems Selling as a Strategy on Industrial Markets’, Industrial Marketing Management 3 (1973).
H. Hakansson and C. Östberg, ‘Industrial Marketing: An Organizational Problem?’, Industrial Marketing Management 4 (1975).
D. Meadows, ‘Estimate Accuracy and Project Selection Models in Industrial Research’, Industrial Management Review, spring 1969. Also ‘Data Appendix: Accuracy of Technical Estimate in Industrial Research Planning’, MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper # 30167.
M. E. Peplow, ‘Design Acceptance’, in S. A. Gregory (ed.), The Design Method ( London: Butterworth, 1960 ).
D. Meadows, ‘Data Appendix: Accuracy of Technical Estimates in Industrial Research Planning’, MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper # 301–67.
Peplow, op. cit., p. 65.
Ibid., p. 66.
E. von Hippel, ‘The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process’, Research Policy 5 (1976), pp. 212–39.
E. von Hippel, ‘The Dominant Role of the User in Semiconductor and Electronic Subassembly Process Innovation’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, May 1977.
E. von Hippel, ‘Transferring Process Equipment Innovations from User-Innovators to Equipment Manufacturing Firms’, R & D Management, October 1977.
A. Berger, Factors Influencing the Locus of Innovation Activity Leading to Scientific Instrument and Plastics Innovations (unpublished SM thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, June 1975 ).
J. Boyden, A Study of the Innovation Process in the Plastics Additives Industry (unpublished SM thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, January 1976 ).
J. Utterback, ‘The Process of Innovation: A Study of the Origination and Development of Ideas for New Scientific Instruments’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, November 1971.
Ibid., p. 129.
Robinson, Farris and Wind, op. cit., p. 6.
Ibid., p. 14.
Ibid., p. 28.
Ibid., p. 128.
Ibid., p. 186.
Ibid., p. 187.
Ibid., p. 188.
S. Myers and D. Marquis, Successful Industrial Innovations (Washington, D. C.: National Science Foundation, NSF 69–17, 1969 ).
Mansfield and Wagner, ‘Organizational and Strategic Factors Associated with Probabilities of Success in Industrial Research & Development’, Journal of Business, April 1975.
R. Isenson, ‘Project Hindsight: An Empirical Study of the Sources of Ideas Utilized in Operational Weapon Systems’, in W. Gruber and D. Marquis (eds), Factors in the Transfer of Technology ( Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969 ) p. 157.
R. Isenson, Project Hindsight (Washington, D. C.: Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, October 1969) p. 47. (Available from NTIS, Document # AD 495 905. While this source is somewhat less accessible than the Gruber and Marquis source cited above, it presents the Project Hindsight findings with more precision and detail.)
Materials Advisory Board, Division of Engineering, National Research Council, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Principles of Research-Engineering Interaction, Publication MAB-222—M (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council, July 1966 ) pp. 15, 16.
A. H. Rubenstein, ‘Studies of Idea Flow in Research and Development’, presented to the New York Chapter, The Institute of Management Sciences, November 1963, p. 2. (As cited in Baker, Siegman and Rubenstein, ‘The Effect of Perceived Needs and Means on the Generation of Ideas for Industrial Research and Development Projects’. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management December 1967, p. 158.)
Myers and Marquis, op. cit., p. 5.
Buckner, How British Industry Buys ( London, Hutchinson, 1967 ).
Scientific American, How Industry Buys/1970 (New York: Scientific American, Inc., 1969 ).
T. Allen, ‘Studies of the Problem-Solving Process in Engineering Design’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, June 1966.
D. Marples, ‘The Decisions of Engineering Design’, IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, June 1961.
T. Allen, ‘Sources of Ideas and Their Effectiveness in Parallel R & D Projects’, in M. C. Yovits et al. (eds), Research Program Effectiveness ( New York: Gordon & Breach, 1966 ).
T. Allen and D. G. Marquis, ‘Positive and Negative Biasing Sets: The Effects of Prior Experience on Research Performance’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, December 1964.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1979 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Hippel, E. (1979). A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation. In: Baker, M.J. (eds) Industrial Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03822-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03822-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03824-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03822-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)