Skip to main content

A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation

  • Chapter
Industrial Innovation

Abstract

It has long been a source of concern to students of marketing research that some of the more sophisticated marketing research techniques, such as multidimensional scaling, routinely used in the generation of ideas for new consumer products, have not been extensively applied to the generation of ideas for new industrial products. Under the well-founded assumption that there is at least latent demand for improved need search and idea generation methodologies in the industrial sector,2 research is being conducted by many to explore differences in the consumer and industrial buying situations, differences that might be preventing straightforward transfer of consumer marketing research tools to that sector.

The research reported on in this paper was supported by the National Science Foundation, Division of Policy Research and Analysis, under Grant # DA — 44366.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Rothwell, C. Freeman et al., ‘Sappho Updated — Project Sappho Phase II’, Research Policy 3 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson, Farris and Wind, Industrial Buying and Creative Marketing, ( Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1967 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Brand, The Industrial Buying Decision ( New York: Wiley, 1972 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.-M. Chofl’ray and G. Lilien, ‘Models of the Multiperson Choice Process with Application to the Adoption of Industrial Products’. Sloan School of Management Working Paper # 861–76, June 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L.-G. Mattsson, ‘Systems Selling as a Strategy on Industrial Markets’, Industrial Marketing Management 3 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Hakansson and C. Östberg, ‘Industrial Marketing: An Organizational Problem?’, Industrial Marketing Management 4 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Meadows, ‘Estimate Accuracy and Project Selection Models in Industrial Research’, Industrial Management Review, spring 1969. Also ‘Data Appendix: Accuracy of Technical Estimate in Industrial Research Planning’, MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper # 30167.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. E. Peplow, ‘Design Acceptance’, in S. A. Gregory (ed.), The Design Method ( London: Butterworth, 1960 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Meadows, ‘Data Appendix: Accuracy of Technical Estimates in Industrial Research Planning’, MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper # 301–67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peplow, op. cit., p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. von Hippel, ‘The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process’, Research Policy 5 (1976), pp. 212–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. von Hippel, ‘The Dominant Role of the User in Semiconductor and Electronic Subassembly Process Innovation’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. von Hippel, ‘Transferring Process Equipment Innovations from User-Innovators to Equipment Manufacturing Firms’, R & D Management, October 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Berger, Factors Influencing the Locus of Innovation Activity Leading to Scientific Instrument and Plastics Innovations (unpublished SM thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, June 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Boyden, A Study of the Innovation Process in the Plastics Additives Industry (unpublished SM thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, January 1976 ).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Utterback, ‘The Process of Innovation: A Study of the Origination and Development of Ideas for New Scientific Instruments’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, November 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson, Farris and Wind, op. cit., p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Myers and D. Marquis, Successful Industrial Innovations (Washington, D. C.: National Science Foundation, NSF 69–17, 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mansfield and Wagner, ‘Organizational and Strategic Factors Associated with Probabilities of Success in Industrial Research & Development’, Journal of Business, April 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Isenson, ‘Project Hindsight: An Empirical Study of the Sources of Ideas Utilized in Operational Weapon Systems’, in W. Gruber and D. Marquis (eds), Factors in the Transfer of Technology ( Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969 ) p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Isenson, Project Hindsight (Washington, D. C.: Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, October 1969) p. 47. (Available from NTIS, Document # AD 495 905. While this source is somewhat less accessible than the Gruber and Marquis source cited above, it presents the Project Hindsight findings with more precision and detail.)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Materials Advisory Board, Division of Engineering, National Research Council, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Principles of Research-Engineering Interaction, Publication MAB-222—M (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council, July 1966 ) pp. 15, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. H. Rubenstein, ‘Studies of Idea Flow in Research and Development’, presented to the New York Chapter, The Institute of Management Sciences, November 1963, p. 2. (As cited in Baker, Siegman and Rubenstein, ‘The Effect of Perceived Needs and Means on the Generation of Ideas for Industrial Research and Development Projects’. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management December 1967, p. 158.)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Myers and Marquis, op. cit., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Buckner, How British Industry Buys ( London, Hutchinson, 1967 ).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scientific American, How Industry Buys/1970 (New York: Scientific American, Inc., 1969 ).

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. Allen, ‘Studies of the Problem-Solving Process in Engineering Design’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, June 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. Marples, ‘The Decisions of Engineering Design’, IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, June 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  37. T. Allen, ‘Sources of Ideas and Their Effectiveness in Parallel R & D Projects’, in M. C. Yovits et al. (eds), Research Program Effectiveness ( New York: Gordon & Breach, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  38. T. Allen and D. G. Marquis, ‘Positive and Negative Biasing Sets: The Effects of Prior Experience on Research Performance’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, December 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Hippel, E. (1979). A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation. In: Baker, M.J. (eds) Industrial Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03822-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics