Abstract
Economic historians working on the Middle East — and particularly on its modern period — have been subject for a generation or a little more to the impact of a complexity of factors of change; these factors have reshaped fields of study hitherto as remote from one another as social science (including economic history) and regional studies (that is, the study of the underdeveloped Three Continents, including the Middle East). From the point of view of methodology — which must be scientific and generally valid, rather than limited to one region — we should question the uses and limits of economic history, not per se but within the framework of the social sciences. This analysis must be concerned with the field under study, with its specific features — the modern Middle East, with special reference to Egypt — yet at the same time be located within the broader framework of Asia, Africa and Latin America.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
A. W. Small, Adam Smith and Modern Sociology vol. I, pp. 235, 238, in H. Becker and H. E. Barnes, Social Thought from Lore to Science, 3rd ed. (New York, 1961), vol. II, pp. 523–6.
Cf. E. Roll, A History of Economic Thought (London, 1962) pp. 11–17, 303–18.
Asa Briggs, ‘History and Society’ in A Guide to the Social Sciences, ed. N. Mackenzie (London, 1966) pp. 33–53.
Cf. Abdel-Malek, ‘La vision du problème colonial par le monde afro-asiatique’ in Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, xxx (1963), pp. 145–56; and ‘Sociology of National Development’, Social Dialectics, vol. 2 (London, 1981 ).
J. Weiler, ‘Le passage de l’analyse à la sociologie économique’ in G. Gurvitch, Traité de sociologie (Paris, 1962) vol. 1, pp. 357–82. He mentions similar criticisms by J. Nef.
C. Wright Mills, The Sociological Imagination (Harmondsworth, 1970) pp. 13–14. J. Berque’s approach to Arab studies has opened new perspectives for specialists by the use of what I would call ‘prospective intuition’.
A. Abdel-Malek, ‘Nasserism and Socialism’ in The Socialist Register 1964 (London, 1964) pp. 38–55.
Copyright information
© 1981 Anouar Abdel-Malek
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abdel-Malek, A. (1981). Sociology and Economic History: an Essay on Mediation. In: Civilisations and Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03819-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03819-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03821-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03819-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)