Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Soviet History and Society ((SSHS))

  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

A consequence of the growth of a network of independent research establishments and the failure to develop widespread R&D at the enterprises was that links between the research laboratory and the plant became a matter of much concern. Firstly, it was necessary to ensure that the work done by these independent organisations was relevant to the needs of industry. Action taken towards this end included the policy of fostering research in the areas of industrial growth and the subordination in 1929 of the majority of the research institutes to organs directly responsible for the individual branches of industry; further it was an important aim of the research planning system. Secondly, the links between research and industry had to ensure the smooth and rapid utilisation in industrial production of the results of the research network’s activities. In this chapter we are specifically concerned with this second aspect — the industrial application of the research undertaken in the Soviet industrial research establishments. However, in practice these two problems were closely related in industrial science policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. E. Fersman, ‘Osnovnye Voprosy Organizatsii Nauchnoi Raboty’, Vestnik Akademii Nauk SSSR, no. 10 (1936) p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a discussion of the term, see P. L. Kapitsa, Teoriya, Eksperiment, Praktika (Moscow, 1966) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. P. Frolov, ‘Osnovnye Zadachi Zavodskikh Laboratorii’, ZL, no. 8–9 (1932) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. I. Bukharin, ‘Tekhnicheskaya Rekonstruktsiya i Tekushchie Prob- lemy Nauchno-Issledovatel’skoi Raboty’, SRIN, no. 1 (1933) pp. 28–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. I. Aksenov, ‘Perestroika Nauchno-Issledovatel’skoi Raboty Tsementnoi Promyshlennosti’, ZL, no. 7 (1934) p. 663.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, the case of Ramzin’s single-pass boiler, K. Ya. Bauman, ‘Polozhenie i Zadachi Sovetskoi Nauki’, Vestnik Akademii Nauk SSSR, no. 10 (1936) p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Reinberg, ‘Pokonchit’ s Otstavaniem Nauchno-Issledovatel’skikh Institutov Promyshlennosti’, FNIT, no. 10 (1936) pp. 100–6, SKIN, no. 8 (1936) pp. 134–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See the case of a process for producing liquid oxygen which had been developed by Kapitsa’s institute, Industriya 10 September 1939, Kapitsa, Teoriya… pp. 42–4, M. M. Levitin, Industriya 27 May 1940; B. Kil’chevskii and G. Mirkin, Industriya 21 August 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. V. Brenev (ed.), Tsentral’naya Radiolaboratoriya v Leningrade (Moscow, 1973) pp. 83–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a western view on the importance of avoiding both an organisational and a spatial barrier, see the chapter by Jack Morton of the famous Bell Laboratories in David Allison (ed.), The RandD Game: Technical Men, Technical Managers, and Research Productivity (Cambridge, Mass., 1969) pp. 213–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. P. Frolov, Osnovnye Zadachi Zavodskikh Laboratorii (Moscow, 1933) p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu. N. Flakserman, Promvshlennost’ i Nauchno-Tekhnicheskie Instituty (Moscow, 1925) p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Chuev, ‘Promyshlennost’ v 1928/29 Godu’, Vestnik Finansov no. 6 (1930) p. 116, Ob‘yasnitel’naya Zapiska k Proektu Edinogo Gosudarstvennogo Byudzheta Soyuza Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh Respublik na 1927–1928 Byudzhetnyi God (Moscow, 1928) p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Ya. Lapirov-Skoblo, Nauchno-Issledovatel’skaya Rabota v Promyshlennosti’, NR, no. 1 (1929) p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. N. Kritsman, ‘Osnovnye Problemy Razvitiya Mashiny v Sotsialisticheskom Khozyaistve’, SRIN, no. 2 (1933) pp. 78–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. A. Armand (ed.), Nauchno-Issledovatel’skie Instituty Tyazheloi Promyshlennosti (Moscow-Leningrad, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, for example, A. N. Bakh and A. N. Frumkin, Industriya 26 October 1938

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Konontsev, Industriya 26 April 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. A. Armand (ed.), Zavodskie Laboratorii Tyazheloi Promyshlennosti. Sbornik Soveta Zavodskikh Laboratorii NKTP SSSR (Moscow-Leningrad, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. A. Chudakov, ‘Problemy Nauchno-Issledovatel’skoi Raboty v Oblasti Mashinostroeniya’, Sovetskaya Nauka, no. 4 (1939) p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example

    Google Scholar 

  22. O. Yu. Shmidt, the vice-president of the Academy of Sciences, in Otchet o Rabote Akademii Nauk SSSR za 1939g. (Moscow-Leningrad, 1940) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For example, in the case of the process developed by Kapitsa’s institute, which has already been referred to; see also A. N. Bakh and A. N. Frumkin, Industriya 26 October 1938, B. Volov, Industriya 11 May 1939, and Industriya for 12 February 1939 and 26 May 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See, for example, R. W. Davies, ‘Aspects of Soviet Investment Policy in the 1920s’, in C. H. Feinstein (ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth (Cambridge, 1967) pp. 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walter Arnold Rukeyser, Working for the Soviets (London, 1932) p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Branch offices and bureaux were, in fact, established abroad, see NR no. 4 (1927) p. 113, V. S. Lel’chuk, Sozdanie Khimicheskoi Promyshlennosti SSSR: iz Istorii Sotsialisticheskoi Industrializatsii (Moscow, 1964) p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. V. Kuibyshev, Izbrannye Proizvedeniya (Moscow, 1958) p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. K. Orzhonikidze, Industrial Development in 1931 and the Tasks for 1932. Report to XVII Conference of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Moscow, 1932) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chudakov, Sovetskaya Nauka, no. 4 (1939) p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. I. Vol’fkovich, FNIT, no. 9 (1933) pp. 36–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Alexander Vucinich, Science in Russian Culture 1861–1917 (Stanford, 1970) p. 395.

    Google Scholar 

  32. For the view that the Soviet Union was almost totally dependent on imported technology in every sphere, see Anthony C. Sutton, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917 to 1930 (Stanford, 1968) and Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1930–1945 (Stanford, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  33. No comprehensive account of the industry in the interwar period has yet been written; material on the development of the industry can be found in Istoriya Vtoroi Mirovoi Voiny Vols I and II (Moscow, 1973 and 1974), The Soviet Aircraft Industry (Chapel Hill, 1955), A. A. Velizhev, Dostizheniya Sovetskoi Aviapromyshlennosti za Pyatnadtsat’ Let (Moscow-Leningrad, 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. I. Bukharin, ‘Tekhnicheskaya Rekonstruktsiya i Tekushcbie Problemy Nauchno-Issledovatelskoi Raboty’, SRIN, no. 1 (1933) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  35. G. K. Ordzhonikidze, Stat’i i Rechi, Vol. II (Moscow, 1957) p. 517.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. S. Yakovlev, Tsel’ Zhizni (2nd edition) (Moscow, 1968) pp. 178–9, 273.

    Google Scholar 

  37. K. E. Baffles, ‘Technology and Legitimacy: Soviet Aviation and Stalinism in the 1930s’, Technology and Culture, XVII (1976) pp. 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Alexander Boyd, The Soviet Air Force since 1918 (London, 1977) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Asher Lee (ed.), The Soviet Air and Rocket Forces (London, 1959) pp. 30, 131.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Sharagin (G. A. Ozerov), Tupolevskaya Sharaga (Frankfurt/M, 1971) pp. 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  41. V. B. Shavrov, Istoriya Konstruktsii Samoletov v SSSR do 1938 Goda (Moscow, 1969) p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. I. Shakhurin, ‘Aviatsionnaya Promyshlennost’ v Gody Velikogo Otechestvennoi Voiny (iz Vospominaniyi Narkoma)’, Voprosy Istorii, no. 3 (1975) p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. Arlazarov, Front Idet Cherez KB (2nd edition, Moscow, 1975) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Magid, Bol’shaya Zhizn’ (Moscow, 1968) p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  45. For the example of Il’yushin and the starting up of production of the I1–2 at the Voronezh plant, see P. Y. Kozlov, Ily Letyat na Front (Moscow, 1976), p. 10; on the moving of Putilov’s design team which designed the Stal’-2 passenger plane to factory no. 81, see Shavrov, Istoriya Konstruktsii Samoletov… pp. 453–4.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Istoriya Vtoroi Mirovoi Voiny Vol. III, p. 383; for such close control elsewhere in the military industrial sector, see

    Google Scholar 

  47. V. Emelyanov, ‘O Vremeni, o Tovarishchakh, o Sebe. Zapiski Inzhenera’, Novyi Mir, no. 2 (1967) pp. 88–90, 105–6.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., pp. 65–89; for a general discussion of Osoaviakhim, see William E. Odom, The Soviet Volunteers: Modernisation and Bureaucracy in a Public Mass Organisation (Princeton, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vaclav Nemecek, ‘Polikarpov: the Prolific Pioneer’, Flying Review International, XXIII (1968) p. 401.

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. Chesalov, ‘General’nyi Konstruktor’, Aviatsiya iKosmonavtika, no. 9 (1963) p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Robert Lewis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, R. (1979). Industrial Research and Innovation. In: Science and Industrialisation in the USSR. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03786-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03786-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03788-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03786-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics