Psychological Determinism in Tess of the d’Urbervilles

  • Leon Waldoff


The conception of tragedy in Tess of the d’Urbervilles rests on an assumption of inevitability. ‘The best tragedy — highest tragedy in short’, Hardy thought, ‘is that of the WORTHY encompassed by the INEVITABLE.’1 Throughout Tess of the d’Urbervilles Hardy invokes several discrete yet interrelated forms of determinism to make his heroine’s fate seem inevitable. Heredity is the most obvious of these. Tess’s ability to see or hear the d’Urberville Coach of the legend and her resemblance to the d’Urberville women of the portraits in the farmhouse at Wellbridge (‘her fine features were unquestionably traceable in these exaggerated forms’ [xxxiv; p. 277]) suggest that she has the fateful blood of the ancient d’Urbervilles in her veins. A somewhat different form of determinism is in Hardy’s use of the laws of Nature, particularly in the great pastoral scenes in which Angel and Tess first discover and resist their love for each other. ‘All the while’, we are told, ‘they were converging, under an irresistible law, as surely as two streams in one vale’ (xx; p. 165). Tess, with her sensuousncss, is an embodiment of the principle in Nature of irresistible sexual attraction. Her flower-red mouth, her pretty face, her fine figure, and her unselfconscious affinity with all that is natural suggest how Nature is a force in her character and determinant of her fate.


Critical Approach Double Standard Male Character Female Character Sexual Object 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Florence Emily Hardy, The Later Years of Thomas Hardy, 1892–1928 (London and New York: Macmillan, 1930) p. 14.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lionel Johnson, The Art of Thomas Hardy (London: John Lane, The Bodley Head, 1923) pp. 231 – 49.Google Scholar
  3. Two perceptive discussions of the issue of responsibility are by Bernard J. Paris: ‘ “A Confusion of Many Standards”: Conflicting Value Systems in Tess of the d’Urbervilles’, NCF, xxiv (1969) 57– 9;Google Scholar
  4. And ‘Experiences of Thomas Hardy’, The Victorian Experience: The Novelists, ed. Richard A. Levine (Athens: Ohio University Press, 1976) pp. 203 – 37.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    Florence Emily Hardy, The Early Life of Thomas Hardy, 1840–1891 (London and New York: Macmillan, 1928) p. 157.Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    For a discussion of the evidence, although in a context of an argument for rape, see F. B. Pinion, Thomas Hardy: Art and Thought (London: Macmillan; Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1977) pp. 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 9.
    Ian Gregor, The Great Web: The Form of Hardy’s Major Fiction (London: Faber & Faber; Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1974) P. 182.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Hardy, quoted by Raymond Blathwayt, ‘A Chat with the Author of “Tess” ’ Black and White, iv (27 August 1892) 238.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    See, e.g., Pierre d’Exidcuil, The Human Pair in the Works of Thomas Hardy, tians. F. W. Crosse (London: H. Toulmin, 1930);Google Scholar
  10. Albert J. Guerard, Thomas Hardy: The Novels and Stories (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1949);Google Scholar
  11. And, especially, J. Hillis Miller, Thomas Hardy: Distance and Desire (London: Oxford University Press; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    My discussion of doubling is generally indebted to Robert Rogers’ authoritative A Psychoanalytic Study of the Double in Literature (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    ‘On the Universal Tendency to Debasement in the Sphere of Love’ (1912); in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, trans. and ed. James Strachey (London: The Hogarth Press, 1953– 66) XI (1957) p. 180.Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    Robert Gittings, Young Thomas Hardy (London: Heinemann; Boston: Little, Brown, 1975) p. 114.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    John Fowles, ‘Hardy and the Hag’, Thomas Hardy after Fifty Years, ed. Lance St. John Butler (London: Macmillan; Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1976) p. 33.Google Scholar
  16. The psychiatrist Charles K. Hofling, in an earlier consideration of Hardy from a psychoanalytic point of view (‘Thomas Hardy and the Mayor of Casterbridge’, Comprehensive Psychiatry, IX [1968] 428 –39), has argued persuasively that Michael Henchard represents certain aspects of Hardy’s psychological nature. Of particular relevance is his speculation ‘that Hardy, like Henchard, was prevented by an unconscious inner force … from effecting a satisfactory union with the principal woman-figure of his adult life’ (p. 439). I interpret this statement as consistent with my argument for splitting. While Hofling does not mention Freud’s paper, the theoretical basis for his speculation derives from Freud’s analysis of the tendency to split the sensuous and affectionate feelings. Less persuasive for me is Robert Gittings’ suggestion that ‘delayed or imperfect physical development’ may have left Hardy with ‘an attraction to the idea of love without the power to fulfil it’ (Gittings, p. 2*9). On the basis of evidence that is acknowledged to be ‘fragmentary’, Gittings offers a conjecture about Hardy’s physical development when a psychological explanation seems called for.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Melanie Klein, ‘Mourning and Its Relation to Manic Depressive States’, Contributions to Psycho-Analysis, 1921–45 (London: The Hogarth Press, 1948) pp. 311 – 38;Google Scholar
  18. W. R. D. Fairbaim, ‘The Ultimate Basis of Aesthetic Experience’, British Journal of Psychology, xxix(1938) 167–81;Google Scholar
  19. and Hanna Segal, ‘A Psycho-Analytical Approach to Aesthetics’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, xxxiii(1952) 196– 207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Leon Waldoff 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon Waldoff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations