The Pay of Manual Workers in the Public Sector

  • R. F. Elliott
  • J. L. Fallick

Abstract

Although the principle of ‘fair comparisons’ is seldom recognised in the formal arrangements for determining the pay of manual workers in the public sector, in practice comparability plays a key role in this process. In practice the wage increases of the majority of manual workers in this sector are established by reference to the size of settlements achieved by other groups of workers in both sectors of the economy. Those comparisons drawn between the settlements of different groups of workers in the public sector impart a degree of rigidity to the wage structure, for the maintenance of ‘traditional relationships’ between pay levels implies a fairly stable hierarchy of wages through time. The more pervasive and dominant such comparisons the more rigid the wage structure and the less scope there exists for granting ‘exceptional’ increases to any single group, for under these circumstances this would merely lead to subsequent increases for all groups and an upward displacement of the general level of wages. Moreover, given the substantially different rates of productivity growth across the sector, such uniform increases in wages while in accord with the economic circumstances of some industries may be highly inflationary in others. One reason for a detailed enquiry into the pay of manual workers in this sector is therefore to discover the extent of the interdependencies in the wage determination process.

Keywords

Income OECD Dock Concession 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. K. Bowers, P. C. Chesheir and A. E. Webb, ‘The Change in the Relationship between Unemployment and Earnings Increases: A Review of Some Possible Explanations’, National Institute Economic Review (November 1970).Google Scholar
  2. C. Balfour, Incomes Policy in the Public Sector, (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972 ).Google Scholar
  3. H. A. Clegg and T. E. Chester, Wage Policy and the Health Service, ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1957 ).Google Scholar
  4. Cohen Council, Second Report (August 1958).Google Scholar
  5. (The Cunningham Committee) Inquiry into the Fire Service, Cmnd. 4807 (HMSO, 1971).Google Scholar
  6. Department of Employment, ‘Numbers of Workers Covered by Principal National Agreement in the United Kingdom’, Department of Employment Gazette (November 1973).Google Scholar
  7. R. Edwards and R. D. V. Roberts, Status, Productivity and Pay: A Major Experiment ( London: Macmillan, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  8. R. F. Elliott, ‘The National Wage Round in the United Kingdom: A Sceptical View’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 38, No. 3 (August 1976) pp. 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. R. F. Elliott, ‘The Frequency of Wage Settlements’, Aberdeen University, Department of Political Economy, Occasional Paper No. 77–16 (1977).Google Scholar
  10. R. F. Elliott and H. C. Shelton, ‘A Wage Settlement Index for the U.K.: 1950–1975’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 40, No. 4 (November 1978).Google Scholar
  11. R. F. Elliott and H. C. Shelton,. ‘The Determinants of Wage Changes in the U.K.: A Model of the Size and Frequency of Settlements’, Aberdeen University Occasional Paper (1979).Google Scholar
  12. A. Flanders and H. A. Clegg (eds.) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1954 ).Google Scholar
  13. K. G. J. C. Knowles and D. Robinson, ‘Wage Rounds and Wage Policy’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 24, No. 2 (May 1962).Google Scholar
  14. K. G. J. C. Knowles and E. M. F. Thorne, ‘Wage Rounds, 1948–59’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 23, No. 1 (February 1961).Google Scholar
  15. LACSAB, Report to the Pay Board on. Relativities, Local Authority Conditions of Service Advisory Board (October 1973).Google Scholar
  16. National Board for Prices and Incomes, The Pay and Conditions of Industrial Civil Servants, Report No. 18, Cmnd 3039 (HMSO, 1966).Google Scholar
  17. OEEC, The Problem of Rising Prices, Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (May 1964).Google Scholar
  18. Sir J. Scamp, Report of the Independent Enquiry into the Pay of Local Authority Manual Workers’, ( London: LACSAB, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  19. (Wilber Committee) Report of a Court of Enquiry into a Dispute between the Parties Represented on a National Joint Industrial Council for the Electricity Supply Industry, Cmnd. 4594 (HMSO, 1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© R. F. Elliott and J. L. Fallick 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. F. Elliott
  • J. L. Fallick

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations