The February Revolution
The third week of February 1917 was the last normal week. From the deck of his flagship, the Krechet, Vice-Admiral Nepenin could see the nucleus of his battle fleet, seven battleships, frozen into the North Harbour at Helsingfors (now Helsinki). With a few exceptions, the rest of the ‘Active Fleet’ — cruisers, destroyers, submarines, mine ships, and auxiliaries — was divided between the two main bases of Helsingfors and Reval (now Tallin). Nepenin felt no particular problems in this fleet he had commanded for five and a half months. Men and ships were going through their January-April hibernation just as they had in the two previous winters. The frozen Gulf of Finland made it impossible for them to put to sea, but it also prevented a Germai naval attack on Petrograd (now Leningrad). Nepenin’s main concern was an early attack on the Gulf of Riga, but against this contingency he had left a battleship and a cruiser in Moon Sound. The situation in the rear also seemed satisfactory, for at Kronstadt and Petrograd the winter training courses were ending, promising an influx of trained men.
KeywordsBlack Reactionary Officer Corps Russian Revolution Small Ship Hunger Strike
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.N. Piterskii, ‘Boevaia podgotovka flota v voennoe vremia (Po opytu imperialisticheskoi voiny 1914–1918 gg.)’, Morskoi sbornik, 1937, no 6, 57fGoogle Scholar
- 8.D. Fedotov, ‘The Russian Navy and the Revolution’, United States Naval Institute Proceedings, XLVIII (1922), goof; Prikaz Komflota no. 976 (t 2.xii.16).Google Scholar
- 14.S. S. Khesin, ‘Russkii flot nakanune Oktiabria’, Istoricheskie zapiski, vol. 81 (1968), 80.Google Scholar
- 19.N. Khovrin, ‘V 1917 godu vo flote’, Krasnaia letopis’, 1926, no. 5(20), 55; Khovrin, Baltiitsy, 43; Sidorov (ed.), 382f; Shliapnikov, Kanun, 56-8.Google Scholar
- 24.D. Fedotoff White, Survival, 77; [I. I. Rengarten], ‘Fevral’skaia revoluitsiia v Baltiiskom flote’, ed. A. K. Drezen, Krasnyi arkhiv, 1929, vol. 1 (32).9-8;Google Scholar
- S. P. Mel’gunov, Na putiakh k dvortsovomu perevorotu, 159. Shul’gin, a member of the Duma, recalled hearing of a naval plan to kidnap the empress, but he dismissed this as ‘idle talk’ (Dni (Belgrade, 1925 ), 127 ).Google Scholar
- 48.A. Th. Kerensky, The Catastrophe: Kerensky’s Own Story of the Russian Revolution (London, 1927 ), 158.Google Scholar