Abstract
The third week of February 1917 was the last normal week. From the deck of his flagship, the Krechet, Vice-Admiral Nepenin could see the nucleus of his battle fleet, seven battleships, frozen into the North Harbour at Helsingfors (now Helsinki). With a few exceptions, the rest of the ‘Active Fleet’ — cruisers, destroyers, submarines, mine ships, and auxiliaries — was divided between the two main bases of Helsingfors and Reval (now Tallin). Nepenin felt no particular problems in this fleet he had commanded for five and a half months. Men and ships were going through their January-April hibernation just as they had in the two previous winters. The frozen Gulf of Finland made it impossible for them to put to sea, but it also prevented a Germai naval attack on Petrograd (now Leningrad). Nepenin’s main concern was an early attack on the Gulf of Riga, but against this contingency he had left a battleship and a cruiser in Moon Sound. The situation in the rear also seemed satisfactory, for at Kronstadt and Petrograd the winter training courses were ending, promising an influx of trained men.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Mutiny in Andrei, Pavel, and Slava. Admiral Nebol’sin killed. Baltic Fleet does not now exist as a fighting force. Will do what I can. Vice-Admiral Nepenin to M. V. Rodzianko, 3 March 19i7
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
N. Piterskii, ‘Boevaia podgotovka flota v voennoe vremia (Po opytu imperialisticheskoi voiny 1914–1918 gg.)’, Morskoi sbornik, 1937, no 6, 57f
D. Fedotov, ‘The Russian Navy and the Revolution’, United States Naval Institute Proceedings, XLVIII (1922), goof; Prikaz Komflota no. 976 (t 2.xii.16).
S. S. Khesin, ‘Russkii flot nakanune Oktiabria’, Istoricheskie zapiski, vol. 81 (1968), 80.
N. Khovrin, ‘V 1917 godu vo flote’, Krasnaia letopis’, 1926, no. 5(20), 55; Khovrin, Baltiitsy, 43; Sidorov (ed.), 382f; Shliapnikov, Kanun, 56-8.
D. Fedotoff White, Survival, 77; [I. I. Rengarten], ‘Fevral’skaia revoluitsiia v Baltiiskom flote’, ed. A. K. Drezen, Krasnyi arkhiv, 1929, vol. 1 (32).9-8;
S. P. Mel’gunov, Na putiakh k dvortsovomu perevorotu, 159. Shul’gin, a member of the Duma, recalled hearing of a naval plan to kidnap the empress, but he dismissed this as ‘idle talk’ (Dni (Belgrade, 1925 ), 127 ).
A. Th. Kerensky, The Catastrophe: Kerensky’s Own Story of the Russian Revolution (London, 1927 ), 158.
Copyright information
© 1978 Evan Mawdsley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mawdsley, E. (1978). The February Revolution. In: The Russian Revolution and the Baltic Fleet. Studies in Russian and East European History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03759-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03759-9_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03761-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03759-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)