Socialism Under Stress: Repression, Radicalisation and the Popular Front

  • Paul Preston


In the widest perspective, the Spanish Left did not view the Asturian rising of 1934 as a defeat. The conviction that Gil Robles had intended to establish fascism in Spain coloured all later leftist judgements of the revolutionary movement. The overall balance, it was felt, had been positive in that Gil Robles had been shown that the peaceful establishment of fascism would not be permitted by the working class. For many on the Left, the words with which Belarmino Tomás had explained the need for surrender to the Asturian miners became symbolic. The surrender was merely ‘a halt on the road’.1 This attitude was adopted by the Trotskyists, the orthodox Communist Party (the PCE) and the FJS. Indeed, the PCE publicly claimed responsibility for Asturias and gained considerable kudos among the proletariat for doing so. The claim was largely false. The Communists had joined the Allanza Obrera in Asturias only at the last minute, deciding to do so on 11 September and actually securing entry into the revolutionary committee on 4 October. Nevertheless, with the PSOE reluctant to accept responsibility, the PCE’s network of clandestine press had some success with its claim.2


Socialist Organisation Political Prisoner Socialist Movement Socialist Leader Popular Front 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Dolores Ibarruri, El IÎnico camino (Paris, 1965) pp. 181–3.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    Azana, letter to Prieto of 16 Jan 1935, Obras, vol. III, pp. 591–3; Juan Simeon Vidarte, Todos fuimos culpables (Mexico, 1973) p. 25.Google Scholar
  3. 18.
    Comýn, PCE vol. II, pp. 459–74; Stanley G. Payne, The Spanish Revolution (London, 1970) pp. 164–5;Google Scholar
  4. Ricardo de la Cierva, La Historia perdida del socialismo espaiiol (Madrid, 1972) pp. 189–90.Google Scholar
  5. 19.
    Largo Caballero, Mis recuerdos p. 141; Santiago Carrillo, Demain l’Espagne (Paris, 1974) p. 32. Prieto believed otherwise; cf. Vidarte, Todos fuimos culpables p. 30.Google Scholar
  6. 23.
    Julian Besteiro, Marxismo y anti-marxismo (Madrid, 1935). References are to the 4th edition (Madrid, 1967) pp. 16–23, 93–102, 107–13, 130–1.Google Scholar
  7. 38.
    José Diaz, Tres alios de lucha 2nd edition (Paris, 1969) pp. 7–30, 33, 57.Google Scholar
  8. 42.
    Claudio Sanchez Albornoz, De mi anecdotario politico (Buenos Aires, 1972) pp. 105, 116.Google Scholar
  9. 43.
    Jacques Duclos, Mémoires (Paris, 1969) pp. 106–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Paul Preston 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Preston

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations