The Practical Relevance of the Anattā-pneuma Concept
What is the significance of our understanding of man in terms of Anattā pneuma for a socially relevant ethic? Is the study of man just an academic subject or one of mere religious or philosophical interest? Has it any bearing on the present-day man’s search for community? Has it anything to say in an age of science and technology when many people, particularly the young, are turning away from traditional forms of religion? I am convinced that our study, though it has been largely academic, can contribute much to the search for authentic selfhood and community, in which Marxists, Maoists and followers of other secular ideologies are as much involved as theologians and philosophers, mystics and hippies.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
14 The Practical Relevance of the Anattā-pneuma Concept
- 2.Harold K. Schilling, The New Consciousness in Science and Religion ( London: S.C.M. Press, 1973 ) p. 25.Google Scholar
- 8.Martin Buber, Between Man and Man, tr. R. G. Smith (London: Kegan Paul, 1947) PP. 147–8.Google Scholar
- 13.R. R. Karanjia, The Mind of Mr. Nehru, ( London: Allen and Unwin, 1960 ) pp. 32–6.Google Scholar
- 14.Theodore Roszak, The Making of a Counter Culture ( London: Faber, 1970 ).Google Scholar
- 15.John Macquarrie, God and Secularity (London: Lutterworth Press, 1868) p. 66.Google Scholar
- 19.See M. M. Thomas, Man and the Universe of Faiths (The Christian Literature Society, P.O. Box 501, Madras 600003, 1975) pp. 121 f.Google Scholar