At present, philosophers of science are taking very little interest in the human sciences. Of course this indifference is understandable. The achievements and applications of the natural sciences are incomparably more spectacular than the conquests of the human sciences. The former give the impression of a continuous development, although historians of science show us that the growth or decline of certain branches of even the most rigorous of these disciplines — mathematics — is bound up with events of an anecdotal nature and is determined by the structure of the occupational context. Despite this, it is difficult not to gain the impression that the history of the natural sciences is guided as if by internal necessity.
KeywordsEducational Achievement Human Science Word Function Modus Tollens Empirical Generalisation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 8.Don Martindale, “Limits to the uses of mathematics in the study of sociology”, in Mathematics and the Social Sciences, Philadelphia, American Academy of Political and Social Science, June 1963.Google Scholar
- Carl Hempel, “The Logic of Functional Analysis” in Aspects of Scientific Explanation (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1965) pp. 297–330;Google Scholar
- Ernest Nagel, Logic without Metaphysics (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1960).Google Scholar
- 14.Leslie White, “Definitions and Conceptions of Culture” in G. Direnzo, Concepts, Theory and Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences (New York: Random House, 1966).Google Scholar