Advertisement

The Three Basic Paradigms of Macrosociology: Functionalism, Neo-Marxism and Interaction Analysis

  • Raymond Boudon

Abstract

Macrosociology is probably the least developed part of sociology. While macroeconomics is a well-organised body of knowledge which can be and is actually presented in textbooks which include a set of logically articulated topics, a treatise in macrosociology typically has the same appearance as philosophy texts; its chapters include presentations of A. Comte’s, Durkheim’s and Weber’s sociology, just as a philosophy text includes chapters on Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Hegel, etc. Why is this so? My contention in this paper is that the primary explanation for the difficulty experienced by sociologists in their attempt to give macrosociology a firm foundation derives chiefly from the coexistence in sociology of three basic paradigms which can scarcely be reconciled with one another. A second and complementary reason is that, while among these three paradigms — functionalism, neo-Marxism and interaction analysis — the third one is probably the most fruitful, at least potentially, although it has attracted less attention among sociologists than the others. In the present paper I will primarily refer to contemporary Western sociology, that is, to sociological works written after the Second World War and produced in Western countries.

Keywords

Educational Opportunity Lower Class Social Conflict Basic Paradigm Philosophy Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    Hannah Arendt, On Violence (Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Nicos Poulantzas, Pouvoir politique et classes sociales (Paris: Maspero, 1971).Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    See for a summary Melvin Tumin, Social Stratification (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1967).Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    George C. Homans, Elementary Forms of Social Behaviour (New York, Chicago, San Francisco and Atlanta: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961).Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    See Anatol Rapoport and Melvin Guyer, “A Taxonomy of 2×2 Games”, General Systems, XI, 1966, pp. 203–14.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    See, e.g. Talcott Parsons, “A Revised Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratifications”, in R. Bendix and S. M. Lipset, Class Status and Power (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1953).Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    See, for instance, Albert Mathiez, La Révolution française (A. Colin, 1963).Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    J. Galtung, “Violence, peace and peace research”, Journal of Peace Research 3, 1969, pp. 167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 15.
    See, for instance, M. Castells, La question urbaine (Paris: Maspero, 1972);Google Scholar
  11. G. Kolko, Wealth and Power in America (New York: Praeger, 1962).Google Scholar
  12. see John Urry and John Wakeford (eds.), Power in Britain (London: Heinemann, 1973).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    H. L. Nieburg, Political Violence (New York: Saint Martin’s Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    Lewis C. Ord, Industrial Frustration (London: Mayflower Books Ltd., 1953) p. 133.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    See for instance, John Goldthorpe, “Social Stratification in Industrial Societies” in R. Bendix and S. M. Lipset, Class. Status and Power, 2nd edn., (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1966).Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    See, for instance, M. Castells, La question urbaine (Paris: Maspero, 1972).Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    See H. Marcuse, One Dimensional Man. Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Society. Traduction française (Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1968).Google Scholar
  19. Paul Goodman, Growing up Absurd (New York: Vintage Books, 1956).Google Scholar
  20. 24.
    Kaare Svalastoga, Prestige, Class and Society (Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1959).Google Scholar
  21. 28.
    Thomas Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict (London: Oxford University Press, 1960);Google Scholar
  22. Albert O. Hirschman, Exit, Voice and Loyalty (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond Boudon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations