Skip to main content

Immortality and Dualism

  • Chapter
Persons and Life after Death

Part of the book series: Library of Philosophy and Religion ((LPR))

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

Someone who believes in immortality is not thereby committed, logically, to believing in dualism and in the possibility of disembodied existence. Nevertheless, any anti-dualist who believes in immortality is committed to believing things which most anti-dualists would find even less plausible than dualism. Observe that if at some future time I die and then undergo bodily resurrection, or if I arrange to have myself deep-frozen and then thawed a few millennia later,1 or if I have my brain transferred to a younger and healthier body, or if I have my brainstates transferred to a younger and healthier brain, or if I undergo rejuvenation at the hands of the micro-surgeons, then no matter how much my bodily existence will have been extended beyond three score years and ten, I will still have an eternity ahead of me. None of the imagined life-prolonging (or life-restoring) episodes would, by itself, bring one immortality, as opposed to mere increased longevity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Robert C. W. Ettinger, The Prospect of Immortality (New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See David M. Armstrong, A Materialist Theory of Mind (London, 1968) p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See my paper ‘Embodiment and Behaviour,’ in Amelie Rorty (ed.), The Identities of Persons (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Saul Kripke, ‘Identity and Necessity’, in Milton Munitz (ed.), Identity and Individuation (New York, 1971), pp. 135–64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See D. M. Armstrong, A Materialist Theory of Mind (London, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Lewis, ‘An Argument for the Identity Theory’, in D. M. Rosenthal (ed.), Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971), and ‘Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications’, in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, No. 3 (December, 1972), pp. 249–57.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Kripke’s ‘Identity and Necessity,’ op. cit., and his ‘Naming and Necessity’, in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language (Dordrecht, 1972), pp. 253–355.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1977 Cornell University Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, H.D. (1977). Immortality and Dualism. In: Persons and Life after Death. Library of Philosophy and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03674-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics