Skip to main content

Interocular Transfer of Visual Learning in the Rat

  • Chapter
  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

A basic assumption in the studies of cerebral disconnection is that interocular transfer is perfect in the intact animal. By this we mean that when a normal animal is trained monocularly on a visual discrimination and when the untrained eye is tested on the same task it will show perfect retention of the learned information. Failure of interocular transfer in the split-brain animal is usually taken as evidence of disruption of commissural integration of cerebral unity.

‘It is an excellent scientific maxim not to appeal to central processes as long as there remains the possibility of explaining the given phenomenon in peripheral terms.’ (Hunter, 1930.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bender, M. B. and Shanzer, S. (1964). Oculomotor pathways defined by electrical stimulation and lesions in the brain stem of monkey. In The Oculomotor System (M. B. Bender, ed.), Harper and Row, New York, pp. 81–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, M. B. and Feldman, M. (1967). Visual illusions during head movement in lesions of the brain stem. Archs Neurol. 17, 354–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi, G. (1972). Anatomy and physiological aspects of visual functions of the corpus callosum. Brain Res., 37, 371–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berlucchi, G. and Rizzolatti, G. (1968). Binocularly driven neurons in visual cortex of split-chiasm cats. Science, 159, 308–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. R. (1966). Cortical lesions and interhemispheric communication in monkeys. Nature, 209, 59–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. R. (1968). A memory record for visual discrimination habits produced in both cerebral hemispheres of monkey when only one hemisphere has received direct visual information. Brain Res., 10, 152–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. R. and Francis, A. C. (1973). Split-brain behavior without splitting: tactile discriminations in monkeys. Israel J. med. Sci., 9, Suppl., 79–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, B. G. and Ainsworth, A. (1969). The topography of the afferent projections of the circumstriate visual cortex (CVC) of the monkey studied by the Nauta method. Vision Res., 9, 733–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. R., Tieman, S. B. and Winter, H. L. (1973). Optic chiasm section affects discriminability of asymmetric patterns by monkeys. Brain Res., 49, 427–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. S. (1930). A consideration of Lashley’s theory of the equipotentiality of cerebral action. J. gen. Psychol., 3, 455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, J. (1966). Mirror-images and the forebrain commissures in the monkey. Nature, 211, 1263–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, J. (1968). Paradoxical interocular transfer of mirror-image discriminations in the optic chiasm sectioned monkey. Brain Res., 10, 127–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasik, T. and Pasik, P. (1964). Optokinetic nystagmus: an unlearned response altered by section of the chiasma and corpus callosum in monkeys. Nature 203, 609–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasik, T. and Pasik, P. (1972). Transmission of `elementary’ visual information through brain commissures as revealed by studies on optokinetic nystagmus in monkeys. In Cerebral Interhemispheric Relations (J. Cernacek and F. Podivinsky, eds), Slovak Academy Science, Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, pp. 267–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmes, J. and Mishkin, M. (1965). A search for the cortical substrate of tactile memories. In Functions of the Corpus Callosum (G. Ettlinger, ed.), Churchill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1965). Functional interactions between cerebral hemispheres of the split-brain monkey. In Functions of the Corpus Callosum (G. Ettlinger, ed.), Churchill, London, pp. 24–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hof, M. W. and Steele Russell, I. (1977). Binocular vision in the rabbit. Physiol. Behay., 19, 121–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hof, M. W. and van der Mark, F. (1976). Monocular pattern discrimination in normal and monocularly light-deprived rabbits. Physiol Behay., 16, 775–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voneida, T. J. and Robinson, J. S. (1970). Effect of brain bisection on capacity for cross comparison of patterned visual input. Expl Neurot, 26, 60–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P. D. (1970). The sensory and motor role of impulses travelling in the dorsal columns towards cerebral cortex. Brain, 93, 505–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeki, S. M. (1967). Visual deficits related to size of lesion in prestriate cortex of optic chiasma sectioned monkeys. Life Sci., 6, 1627–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 I. Steele Russell, M. W. van Hof and G. Berlucchi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Russell, I.S., Bookman, J.F., Mohn, G. (1979). Interocular Transfer of Visual Learning in the Rat. In: Russell, I.S., van Hof, M.W., Berlucchi, G. (eds) Structure and Function of Cerebral Commissures. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03645-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics