Abstract
On the face of it, the notion of ‘nationalisation’ would seem to be quite straightforward: it must mean simply the takeover of a private firm (company or corporation) by the state. Together with this apparently simple notion there are often associated some equally crude ideological conceptions: that such state takeovers are acts of ‘socialism’ and anticapitalist in nature; that nationalised business or nationalised industries are, or by state control can be made to be, more socially responsible or accountable than private firms; or that ‘national’ control through the state of the economy is more beneficial than foreign ownership. Such ideas have only to be stated for it to be apparent that the question of nationalisation is much more complex than this, and that many of the views held about it, even only subconsciously, contain only a small grain of truth. In order to understand the processes involved in nationalisation, it is necessary first to look behind the institutional or legal forms involved. The aim of this paper is to try to establish some sort of theoretical perspective, based on a Marxist approach, to help us understand what is behind the changing relations of the state and private business all round the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
U.S. Senate Subcommittee on International Trade of the Committee on Finance, The Multinational Corporation and the World Economy, Staff Print (26 February 1973 )
S. Hymer, ‘The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development’ in H. Radice (ed.), International Firms and Modern Imperialism, (1975)
John Holloway and Sol Picciotto, ‘Capital, Crisis and the State’, Capital & Class 2, (1977) pp. 76–101.
J. Hirsch, ‘The State Apparatus and Social Reproduction: Elements of a Theory of the Bourgeois State’, in Holloway and Picciotto (eds.), The State and Capital, (London: 1977 ) p. 74
P.L. Payne, ‘The Emergence of the Large-Scale Company in Great Britain 1870–1914’ Economic History Review xx (1967) p. 519
C. Wilson, The History of Unilever vol I (1954), p. 41
K. Marx, Grundrisse (London: 1973) p. 531
F. Neumann, ‘The Change in the Function of Law in Modern Society’ (1937), printed in The Democratic and the Authoritarian State (Free Press, 1957 )
M. Wilkins, The Emergence of Multinational Enterprise: American Business Abroad from the Colonial Era to 1914 (Harvard, 1970 )
Claudia von Braunmühl, ‘On the Analysis of the Bourgeois Nation-State Within the World Market Context’, in Holloway and Picciotto (eds.) The State and Capital, (1977).
I. Wallerstein, The Modern World-System, (New York, 1974 )
C. Wilson, History of Unilever (1954)vol. I, p. 166
Greenhill and Miller, ‘The Peruvian Government and the Nitrate Trade 1873–1879’, Journal of Latin American Studies vol. v, (1973) pp. 107–131
A.G. Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America (1967) pp. 7385.
H. Blakemore, British,Nitrates and Chilean Politics 1886–1896, (1974)
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1978 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Picciotto, S. (1978). Firm and State in the World Economy. In: Faundez, J., Picciotto, S. (eds) The Nationalisation of Multinationals in Peripheral Economies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03619-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03619-6_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03621-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03619-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)