Abstract
Jonson gives us what is the entirely orthodox neo-classical theory deriving from Aristotle when he tells us in the Prologue to Every Man in his Humour that it is the function of comedy ‘to sport with human follies not with crimes’. It is a definition which still influences the general idea of comedy, which, most people would feel, should be limited in the seriousness of its concerns, unless it is self-consciously ‘black comedy’. What then ofjonson’s own play Volpone: fraud, perjury, prostitution, conspiracy to murder, attempted rape — are these merely follies? Volpone has made many of Jonson’s critics uneasy and uncertain of its classification. E. B. Partridge’s comments are representative:
Comic masks are not entirely appropriate for a play which creates such a profound sense of evil that the tone seems closer to tragedy than comedy … Is it satire, burlesque, farce, comedy of humour, melodrama? … all of these critical terms have some validity, but none is wholly justifiable.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ferdinand Brunetière, Les Epoques du Théâtre Français (1636–1850) (Paris 1901 – 5e édit.), p. 147.
H. Levin ‘Jonson’s Metempsychosis’, Philological Quarterly 22 (1943), 231 – 9.
Jonas A. Barish, ‘The Double Plot in Volpone’, Modern Philology 51 (1953), 83 – 92.
See Alvin Kernan (ed.) Volpone (New Haven and London 1962), p. 214.
Richard Perkinson ‘Volpone and the reputation of Venetian justice’, Modern Language Review 35 (1940), 11 –18.
Ian Donaldson ‘Volpone: Quick and Dead’, Essays in Criticism 21 (1971), 121 – 34.
John Creaser makes much of this point in his article ‘Volpone’s Mortification’ Essays in Criticism 25 (1975), 329–56, and there is further discussion of this article in ‘The Critical Forum’, Essays in Criticism 26 (1976), 274–8.
Emanuel S. Chill, ‘Tartuffe, Religion, and Courtly Culture’, French Historical Studies 3 (1963), 176.
Jacques Schérer, Structures de Tartuffe (Paris 1966), p. 186.
John Cairncross, New Light on Molière (Geneva and Paris 1956) and also Molière Bourgeois et Libertin.
Georges Pholien, ‘Une défense de Tartuffe’, Marche Romane 17 (1967), 183.
Lionel Gossman, ‘Molière and Tartuffe: Law and Order in the Seventeenth Century’, French Review 43 (1970), 910.
Raymond Picard, ‘ Tartuffe “Production impie”?’ in Mélanges d’histoire littéraire offerts à Raymond Lebèque (Paris 1969), pp. 227–39.
Copyright information
© 1980 Nicholas Grene
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grene, N. (1980). Follies and Crimes. In: Shakespeare, Jonson, Molière. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03603-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03603-5_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03605-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03603-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)