Human Relations School
Classical theory emphasised the coordination of the physical processes and the adjustment of human beings to these processes. The human relations approach coordinated the human and social elements within the plant or firm into a functioning whole. Human relations theorists assumed the physical processes and structure of organisation as given. Such a structure, according to them, contained a social system, an equilibrating social organism, a complexity of groups and cultural currents — in short a plant society. This is another way of saying that human relations is deeply concerned with attitudes, values, and emotional responses, or more generally with the social psychology of men and groups.
KeywordsTest Group Human Relation Test Room Output Restriction Informal Group
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Fritz J. Roethlisberger and William J. Dickson, Management and the Worker ( Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1939 ).Google Scholar
- 2.Elton Mayo, The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, (Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 2nd ed., 1946)Google Scholar
- Elton Mayo, also The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1945 ).Google Scholar
- 3.V. Delbert, C. Miller and W. H. Form, Industrial Sociology (New York: Harper & Row, 2nd ed., 1964 ) p. 677Google Scholar
- and J. A. C. Brown, The Social Psychology of Industry (London: Penguin, 1954 and 1961 ) pp. 69–96.Google Scholar
- 6.R. Likert, ‘A Motivational Approach to a Modified Theory of Organization and Management’, in M. Haire, (ed.), Modern Organization Theory ( New York: Wiley, 1959 ) p. 191.Google Scholar
- 7.Douglas McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise ( New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960 ).Google Scholar